[quote="Khlav Kalash":1e2mkeb2]Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed. [url=https://ibb.co/LXj4PdP2:1e2mkeb2][img:1e2mkeb2]https://i.ibb.co/jP075k51/Snip-Image.jpg[/img:1e2mkeb2][/url:1e2mkeb2][/quote:1e2mkeb2] As I pointed out with the previous plans, it was impossible for the gantry to be accommodated in that design. This is a far neater solution and will look better also.

Although not shown, I wonder if a reprofile of the existing terracing is on the cards ala the NS.

[quote="Khlav Kalash":3imnh9a1]Although not shown, I wonder if a reprofile of the existing terracing is on the cards ala the NS.[/quote:3imnh9a1] It doesn’t look that way. Think I mentioned it when the plans went up there looks to be nothing to suggest that the bottom area will be raised or the terrace reprofiled. Seems like these adaptations to original gantry will cut down some space in the office/gantry area. I do like the idea of a raised roof angle though.

[quote="Trojan Horse":1qo5yrse]It doesn’t look that way. Think I mentioned it when the plans went up there looks to be nothing to suggest that the bottom area will be raised or the terrace reprofiled. Seems like these adaptations to original gantry will cut down some space in the office/gantry area. I do like the idea of a raised roof angle though.[/quote:1qo5yrse] No plans showed the north stand re-profile either. As I said it'll depends how permanent this arrangement is. If it's for 10 years or so then it's worth looking at, if there are bigger plans in the offing then it's not.

[quote="Khlav Kalash":15ieyvjz]No plans showed the north stand re-profile either. As I said it'll depends how permanent this arrangement is. If it's for 10 years or so then it's worth looking at, if there are bigger plans in the offing then it's not.[/quote:15ieyvjz] I was sure that in the documents it mentioned new terracing and new barriers in the north and in the drawings they were referenced for the north development. Out of excitement I had a real good nosey at them. I haven’t read the documents thoroughly on the west and only scanned the drawings so I may have a read later of all documents to see if there is anything at all.

[quote="Trojan Horse":2sdpy2gu]I was sure that in the documents it mentioned new terracing and new barriers in the north and in the drawings they were referenced for the north development. Out of excitement I had a real good nosey at them. I haven’t read the documents thoroughly on the west and only scanned the drawings so I may have a read later of all documents to see if there is anything at all.[/quote:2sdpy2gu] Apologies I meant formally submitted planning drawings. Of course there are working drawings which did show it.