[quote="PopTart":3mbzl5li]They can play there but we should have 6 who play there without disrupting other positions.
Of course Vagana could be the 6th but I think we are trying to make him a SR so he should be focusing on that first.
Lingard is too young for now. He's an occasional player for me till he develops.
Cozza no. He should only be cover. We don't have enough cover at 13.[/quote:3mbzl5li]
Vagana is a prop but we seem to be trying him more at second row. I think he will play on bench for us as a second row and come on for impact after 55/60. But he is a prop and certainly good enough and big enough to play there. Will be interesting to see how he develops.
Shaw and Lingard are there if we start to struggle with injuries. At least we have options.
13 is an area we are short in, I’m curious who will be favourite to spell with Pitts in the 17. I think it could possibly be Hood for final 20.
[quote="Trojan Horse":3sd13yhm]Vagana is a prop but we seem to be trying him more at second row. I think he will play on bench for us as a second row and come on for impact after 55/60. But he is a prop and certainly good enough and big enough to play there. Will be interesting to see how he develops.
Shaw and Lingard are there if we start to struggle with injuries. At least we have options.
13 is an area we are short in, I’m curious who will be favourite to spell with Pitts in the 17. I think it could possibly be Hood for final 20.[/quote:3sd13yhm]
That's pretty much what I've just said
But we need another prop if we don't want to move Vagzna from second row, nove Cozza from 13 or play a kid who isn't ready for a full season.
[quote="Trojan Horse":1rcyaowb]Vagana is a prop but we seem to be trying him more at second row. I think he will play on bench for us as a second row and come on for impact after 55/60. But he is a prop and certainly good enough and big enough to play there. Will be interesting to see how he develops.
Shaw and Lingard are there if we start to struggle with injuries. At least we have options.
13 is an area we are short in, I’m curious who will be favourite to spell with Pitts in the 17. I think it could possibly be Hood for final 20.[/quote:1rcyaowb]
If we were looking at bringing someone in, I'd be looking at a 13. Didn't think Cozza had a partivularly good game on Boxing Day, if I'm honest. I would say he is probably, the weak link in our pack if we have one
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
