|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2141 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Belle Vue":2w1swzve]Had a falling out session at just about every club he’s been at…
Which is probably why St George only offered him a limited contract.[/quote:2w1swzve]
Tbf Flannagans even denying that now. Shame as he’s a quality player.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7161 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="PopTart":3ky3k3ln]It's not that they aren't happy. It's just some said they would have voted positively if it had been just quota so have asked for a remote with just that.
I think the immediate part was just media hype. Salford had a challenge to reduce their bill. They were still working on investment to plug the gap
I think that ship sailed on Saturday though.[/quote:3ky3k3ln]
There are still offers though so it would make more sense to move on those offers and when those are exhausted to then offer dispensation on those that remain.
Hard to tell these days what’s true in media with all these media Facebook pages which seem to be cut and paste part of stories and see how far they can embellish it.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 268 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="Pat Bateman":z5pmjglo]Tbf Flannagans even denying that now. Shame as he’s a quality player.[/quote:z5pmjglo]
Yep…. Think it was Brisbane where he was at his best . Trouble is that if you don’t keep on top of your game or fall by the wayside in their competition…. Your out..
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4246 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Salford latest, affecting us...
Salford "...can sell to only four clubs – Castleford, Wakefield, Leigh and Hull, although that might change by this Wednesday following another RFL meeting,” King told League Express.
“We have been offered a minimal transfer fee, for example, for one of our leading players.
At this Wednesday’s meeting League Express understands that the clubs will agree to a two-week period in which the above four clubs will be able to bid for Salford players with a view to reaching the maximum salary cap level."
His statement seems a little contradictory - it actually looks like to 2 week window was granted a fortnight ago and that it could change this Wednesday.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7161 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| [quote="dboy":2bvxizvb]Salford latest, affecting us...
Salford "...can sell to only four clubs – Castleford, Wakefield, Leigh and Hull, although that might change by this Wednesday following another RFL meeting,” King told League Express.
“We have been offered a minimal transfer fee, for example, for one of our leading players.
At this Wednesday’s meeting League Express understands that the clubs will agree to a two-week period in which the above four clubs will be able to bid for Salford players with a view to reaching the maximum salary cap level."
His statement seems a little contradictory - it actually looks like to 2 week window was granted a fortnight ago and that it could change this Wednesday.[/quote:2bvxizvb]
So they’ve received offers from 4 clubs but are holding out it seems. From that it appears they want exemptions to invite competition from clubs that are full on cap and quota to drive up and coming.
That’s hardly what was supposed to happen. It’s nice they’re in a position to just not bother accepting offers it seems.
I hope majority of clubs like previous vote refuse to grant cap and quota exemptions.
Why should clubs spent on cap and quota be afforded the opportunity.
I could understand if there was no offers but that doesn’t seem the case.
|
|
|
|
|