| FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > IMG Announce Proposed Criteria for Super League 2025 |
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 129 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Being pleasantly surprised by the scoring, I've had a stab at the score breakdown. I have to admit to having to score higher than I predicted in some areas in order to reach the 12.52 score awarded by IMG.
But with the score bandings in most sections being structured very much in a way where common sense can rule out any other possibilities - it leaves only a few areas where the scores could differ. (Without knowing unpublished figures within accounts, official stadium capacities for this season etc).
The scores do support statements from the club - stronger than I envisaged in the Fandom and Financial areas. I actually do agree with some of the sentiments from Championship clubs that the scoring (particularly in fandom) heavily favors existing Super League clubs. And probably show the correct areas have been prioritised at WT, despite perceptions. As weak as I do think our marketing/social channels have been over the last few years...the stats tick the boxes needed within the criteria.
Also attempted to forecast next year's score, again heavily based on guesswork and common sense. But there are some notes to justify my thinking.
Grading handbook for ref: https://www.rugby-league.com/uploads/do ... pdated.pdf
Attempted scoring breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =882465910 |
|
Being pleasantly surprised by the scoring, I've had a stab at the score breakdown. I have to admit to having to score higher than I predicted in some areas in order to reach the 12.52 score awarded by IMG.
But with the score bandings in most sections being structured very much in a way where common sense can rule out any other possibilities - it leaves only a few areas where the scores could differ. (Without knowing unpublished figures within accounts, official stadium capacities for this season etc).
The scores do support statements from the club - stronger than I envisaged in the Fandom and Financial areas. I actually do agree with some of the sentiments from Championship clubs that the scoring (particularly in fandom) heavily favors existing Super League clubs. And probably show the correct areas have been prioritised at WT, despite perceptions. As weak as I do think our marketing/social channels have been over the last few years...the stats tick the boxes needed within the criteria.
Also attempted to forecast next year's score, again heavily based on guesswork and common sense. But there are some notes to justify my thinking.
Grading handbook for ref: https://www.rugby-league.com/uploads/do ... pdated.pdf
Attempted scoring breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =882465910 | |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4700 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 2268 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: FIL "Shudds improving their SM scores, it would appear...
There SM teams statement shows there targets on platforms for 2024 are behind what Trinitys are already 
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4700 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Cheers FT, sounds good but do clubs get graded on hits/subscriptions or % increases ??
If it's the latter then I would hope that our % increases will be going through the roof in the next 12 months, especially if we can get some success on the field  |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 21031 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: FIL "Cheers FT, sounds good but do clubs get graded on hits/subscriptions or % increases ??
If it's the latter then I would hope that our % increases will be going through the roof in the next 12 months, especially if we can get some success on the field ![]()
It's purely on impressions or 'hits'. So that's likes shares and comments.
That is a new figure each year.
But also followers and subscribers which you are more likely to keep each year.
Looks good and I think we could eventually do a similar article to encourage growth but posting % increases mean nothing to IMG if you were very low in the first place.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 2268 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: PopTart ".
Looks good and I think we could eventually do a similar article to encourage growth but posting % increases mean nothing to IMG if you were very low in the first place.'"
Yep a 99% increase on 100 hits takes you to 199 hits, bit of smoke and mirrors going on with Hudds here trying to make out they are smashing new heights supporter engagement  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
