Lots of things that both parties would need assurances on…what are the new owners plans to protect the clubs foundation, academy set up, community work, how long are they committed for, why do they want to own the club, where’s the money coming from, who will actually own the club, what happens if we get relegated, who will run it day to day…what are their credentials(!!!!). Now you might say many of those points are nothing to do with the current board but if due diligence is being done properly and to ensure the long term future of the club then it’s right those should be answered. Also Mr Ellis would have lots of questions and evidence needed from the current board.

J M, came on here last week to stop all the untrue rummers and false gossip that was been said about the club, and it is still going on Might as well start a rummer that the East stand is made out of paper and the North stand .Just can not beleave some of the dross that gets said about the ground, M C ,and J M Should be more worried about a lot of the dross ,on the field

Echoing Legend,JM stated quite recently that in his opinion the takeover was progressing as expected and just needed more time.Not being eligible to go to the meeting myself,I have read the comments of those that went and nothing untoward seems to have been said.(I think someone said that parts of the meeting must remain confidential and I accept that.Has something significant changed?And if not, why has this meeting stirred up so much bitterness and arguing that it is starting to overshadow tomorrows massively important match? Let's get behind the team.

I can tell you nothing in the meeting about the takeover was controversial or anything that contradict what JM said on video. The confidential part was more to allow people to discuss things openly.

Thanks PT.