On the face of it, this is odd.
Why the sudden need to make amendments? You've already alluded to reducing cost?
But why?
Wouldn't the club have agreed a fixed cost with the developer before the works started?
And agreed the details of the job in prior knowledge of the available budget?

His sister is a pretty good player tbf....

Ok. Incredible meeting with so much discussed.

I will attempt in the next week or so to tell you what was said. I will need to run it past JM before I do so. This is because I need to be sure that I’m not letting out sensitive info as much of what was discussed is still ongoing.

Things I can tell you are.

I walked on the pitch and it’s incredibly flat. What it isn’t is noticeably higher, maybe 6 inches at most.

The pitch offers 30 - 40 hours a week usage which I think is a heck of a lot. We will save a young players wage not having to rent training facilities.


All being well the steal work will go up in October.

The North stand can be extended at a later date, however that will only be if there is a demand for extra capacity. As explained to me it will look better than you might think, a lot better.

I believe JM will put out a release at some point to explain. However this will be when he gets the chance as they are incredibly busy.

There is loads more to report but bear with me please.

As for as on field, I honestly got nothing but then I didn’t really ask.

Whose saying it? If you go on the planning portal the revision was made in August. Reduces capacity but not sure how it’s uglier.

It was this bit. I may have been reading it out of context.

Sorry I meant in an engineering respect. What it will look like will depend on how they finish it off.