Surely you are not putting the opposition scoring at will when Jordans off to slow distribution? I'll add our distribution hasn't been great by anyone. We'd only played 23 minutes v Saints and it was 0-0. A recognised hooker plays from there on in and we get smashed. Two tries through poor defence by our hooker in same game. Recognised hooker starts v Hull and we are losing 8-0. When we've had recognised hookers on we've created nothing and leaked points. That's probably why poor Jordan gets put there. Fans don't look that close and I'll bet three-quarters wouldn't know about the stats and point the finger at Jordan rather than the actual hookers. I like most don't want Jordan at hooker. But our hookers have been injured and not fired upon their return. Hopefully they'll start firing and get back to 80minute footy so he doesn't have to go there.

It’s a shame though as the extra time would’ve continued and although we don’t know who would have won there would have been an opportunity. Like you say though, it matters not that Ganson states it was an incorrect decision because the mistake is in the history books.

Best to forget it and move on to Hull KR anyway now. I got my tickets and I’m hoping we can come out with that long awaited win!

Don't forget the forward passes for Konrad's try neither

I’ve always said wakefield fans are gracious.

Tanginoa steps into his path and drops his shoulder to his left. But if it makes you feel better you can have that one, not that it counts for much.

Yep and thats why thers report the refs boss as admitted it wasnt a penalty.you can have it either way that was a penalty then the one on tom johnstone in first game should of also been a pen ya onow the one you scored a try off..could also say bricoe shoud of been in bin for spear tackle or the forward passes for the hurrel try....best way to look at tjough is all the neutral and tv pundits saying all the 50 50 calls went in leeds favour