Ah, yes I get what you mean now and falls in line with the rest of the post. I should have clicked on really. I think you might be right though, two egos in one team.

Must admit you'd think so but stranger things have happened.

If he left now why would no fee be involved he is under contract with us

I thought that.

Look at it this way, if we get a fee we didn't want him to leave, if we don't then I suspect we did.

Assuming of course any of this is true.

I talk to Joe most days, he laughed this one off when someone put it on the Cas forum the other week, which is the reason I said it wasn`t true to start with.

Who knows where he will be next season though, he is OOC with us so I believe free to speak to other clubs from June.

Probably the 2 + 2 = 5 reasoning used by the site that published the rumour, one almost certainly started by his agent.

I'm sorry April fools Day has gone. Crowther is not even Dewsbury standard. Can't even compare the 2.

Never said he was ! The reply was to the insinuations that Westerman wanted to leave . He’s our best forward at the min .... as for Crowther he’s never been given a chance to develop at LF and he’s def not a hooker , but giving his all while being asked to play there .

Lad has put his hand up and playing a position that’s alien to him and he’s getting bagged, Jesus wept. Crowther will never be a world beater but he’s a damn good SL standard second rower who is no nonsense in defence and runs his blood to water for our club, something players like fifita want to take a look at, imagine is crowther was his size. Not Crowthers fault he’s having to do this role because of our coach’s clear inabilities to find a hooker during the off season to try get the team moving forward.

I don't remember anyone saying we needed a hooker at the end or during the closed season.

If Kyle Wood was fit the Crowther criticism would be academic as he wouldn't get selected there.