If only they were as consistent as you eh

Totally agree Wayne...as I said, I thought Liam Moore had a good game but it was Thaler who got it wrong as Amor was clearly off-side and then clearly with 10, so it should have been chalked off like ours was the other week. They just need to change that rule to one that actually makes sense

Referees have always been inconsistent. Are you telling me that Mick Naughton refereed the game in the same way as Fred Lindop? The way they referee reflect the ref's subjectivity.

My only gripe about refs is the impact that Steve Ganson has had as their chief. He reffed games like we'd all paid twenty quid to watch a reffing display. He runs the refs the same way, looking out for every possible infringement, making the ref the most important figure. This makes the players play for penalties, because it's usually met with a response. The players do the cheating and play-acting, but because the refs pander to it.

Let the players get on with it and it'll be a better spectacle. And I can bet the refs would prefer that, instead of having to be told at every video review of the minor infringements they missed. The NRL is noticeably freer of penalties than Super League.

Spot on. Mind you Ganson was hardly the first, Holdroyd absolutely adored himself and even Lindop had an ego, all refs do. Also SKY pundits don’t help with there endless hindsight based reffing. Ho hum...

There's a lot of controversy going on at the moment between our round ball friends regarding the brain damaging effects of heading the ball, particularly amongst those veteran players who were around in the old soddened leather football days. everything must be done in the modern game to alleviate any threat of head/brain damage. I's not a matter of being "soft". It's a matter of being sensible.

Agree, the knee to the head that Tredesgo took in the origin game would be 10 years of heading the ball in the round ball game.