Because you constantly imply a connection but distance yourself from it when challenged. Either make your point clearly or don't make your point, but don't keep quoting other people and then say it wasn't your view and other posters are putting words in your mouth.

I have to say again, I'm running out of enthusiasm for this thread. When it was a discussion about covid and the current issues then it was worth a discussion but world politics and the inner workings of Miro's mind are not really for this forum.
That can be picked up in the Sin Bin forum.

Go on then, just for clarity, perhaps you could answer him ?

Here we are, more fake argument from the so called "moderator" of this forum.
He has no idea whether or not I have spoken to my MP or any MP.
No idea as to whether I have started a petition let alone taken part in one.
No idea whether I have made "legitimate" contact with the media.

Really disappointed in this guy, yup, really disappointed.

Maybe I will if he asks again but whether he deserves an answer is something else.

As for you, I asked for context, you have not provided any yet.

You ask.
What are you (deliberately ) not understanding?
The covid deaths are not false.
Cause of death, especially in older people, usually has more than one contributory cause. A professional doctor would list covid-19 on the death certificate if it was a or the cause of death. Dying from kidney failure caused by thickening of blood caused by covid is still a death caused by covid.

By  Malcolm Kendrick, doctor and author who works as a GP in the National Health Service in England.
As an NHS doctor, I’ve seen people die and be listed as a victim of coronavirus without ever being tested for it. But unless we have accurate data, we won’t know which has killed more

Why do I need evidence, I asked a question. A evan a retorical question does not require evidence.
However, this is the reason for my perfectly legitimate question.

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion to resolve charges of illegal and fraudulent promotion of its products.

I have no reason to believe this is still not an ongoing problem inside the medical profession, hence the question.

What negative measures are the WEF proposing?
If the world at large is going to ignore the proposals, what's your problem with them?

Because of the fallout as they attempt implementation. Rather like the USA promising to re-build Iraq, Afghanistan etc.. Look how that turned out.

Yet when I asked, you wouldn't answer, and still don't.
I think you've had enough air time but you've wasted that opportunity to try and score points with those trying to discuss your opinions.

If you want to raise another thread to discuss something specific you are welcome to do so. But if it's just the same stuff as this thread I think we've exhausted it.