Yes, at this stage in my opinion I wouldn't rule it out.

The anthrax case reemerged in 2011 following a lawsuit in relation to the first victim. A huge payout of $2.5 million was made to the family of Robert Stevens killed by anthrax.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/a ... ement.html

Interesting takeways from the article:-

The accused perpetrator of the attacks did an "[uEpstein[/u" - [iDr. Ivins killed himself in 2008 as prosecutors prepared to indict him in the attacks,[/i"

Don't you find it a tad bit suspicious that they always end up dead?

Conclusion of the law suit:-

[i"In a July filing in the civil case, Justice Department lawyers said Dr. Ivins “[udid not have the specialized equipment[/u” in his lab to make the dry anthrax powder in the letters — appearing to contradict the department’s claims in the criminal case. Days later, the lawyers retracted the statement."[/i and then of course they got the substantial hush money!

Nothing adds up with anthrax just like the C19 narrative.

I'm also beginning to see similarities with the anthrax attack being used as a cover to press forward in passing the Patriot Act to how George Floyd's death could be used in the long run to help bring about "unconscious biased" AI policing fed off mass surveillance data. There was certainly more to that George Floyd story than the virtue signalling from the mainstream media would let you know.

Here's a company that would need to be kept an eye on for pushing the AI tech agenda.

https://carbyne911.com/

Nice to see all the usual "Partners" are affiliated to them. And its 'Meet our Team' page also shows they've got the personnel to implement the plan. All for the mega rich to benefit at the expense of our rights.

Yes, at this stage in my opinion I wouldn't rule it out.

The anthrax case reemerged in 2011 following a lawsuit in relation to the first victim. A huge payout of $2.5 million was made to the family of Robert Stevens killed by anthrax.

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/us/a ... ement.html

Interesting takeways from the article:-

The accused perpetrator of the attacks did an "[uEpstein[/u" - [iDr. Ivins killed himself in 2008 as prosecutors prepared to indict him in the attacks,[/i"

Don't you find it a tad bit suspicious that they always end up dead?

Conclusion of the law suit:-

[i"In a July filing in the civil case, Justice Department lawyers said Dr. Ivins “[udid not have the specialized equipment[/u” in his lab to make the dry anthrax powder in the letters — appearing to contradict the department’s claims in the criminal case. Days later, the lawyers retracted the statement."[/i and then of course they got the substantial hush money!

Nothing adds up with anthrax just like the C19 narrative.

I'm also beginning to see similarities with the anthrax attack being used as a cover to press forward in passing the Patriot Act to how George Floyd's death could be used in the long run to help bring about "unconscious biased" AI policing fed off mass surveillance data. There was certainly more to that George Floyd story than the virtue signalling from the mainstream media would let you know.

Here's a company that would need to be kept an eye on for pushing the AI tech agenda.

https://carbyne911.com/

Nice to see all the usual "Partners" are affiliated to them. And its 'Meet our Team' page also shows they've got the personnel to implement the plan. All for the mega rich to benefit at the expense of our rights.

=#FF0000I guess misinterpretation & misrepresentation are the main talents of conspiracy artists. That's clearly not what I said and you know it.

=#0000FFDo you have any evidence that the report from the BBC is untrue in any way? or does it just go against what you want to be true?

=#00BF00My coffee break (or even my life) is not long enough to trawl through your missives on here, but I'm pretty sure you said or implied that deaths from/with covid are exagerated by people who die of other things after recovering.

Similarly with Pop Tart, could you list all the goals of the 'great reset' and then point out which ones you think are bad?

I'll get you started:
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset

I mean, all that sustainable development and reducing inequality has got to be a bad thing, right?

How likely do you think that all the nations on the earth will enthusiastically accept the findings of the WEF in January? Particularly those who have been hit most harshly economically.

=#FF0000I guess misinterpretation & misrepresentation are the main talents of conspiracy artists. That's clearly not what I said and you know it.

=#0000FFDo you have any evidence that the report from the BBC is untrue in any way? or does it just go against what you want to be true?

=#00BF00My coffee break (or even my life) is not long enough to trawl through your missives on here, but I'm pretty sure you said or implied that deaths from/with covid are exagerated by people who die of other things after recovering.

Similarly with Pop Tart, could you list all the goals of the 'great reset' and then point out which ones you think are bad?

I'll get you started:
https://www.weforum.org/great-reset

I mean, all that sustainable development and reducing inequality has got to be a bad thing, right?

How likely do you think that all the nations on the earth will enthusiastically accept the findings of the WEF in January? Particularly those who have been hit most harshly economically.

So, you stated this: By the way, a direct quote not implied.
=#800000“Because cause of death is usually complicated. People actually only die of one thing and that's a lack of oxygen to the brain. The reasons for this lack of oxygen are varied and often complex. It can also be a combination of factors where even if just one wasn't present, they may have survived. Cause of death is more often than not a matter of professional judgement for the doctors.”

Are these some of the same doctors who took big pharmas bribe?

So this BBC headline and all those claims that there are 50,000 deaths from “covid” are most likely false, according to coco.
BBC......”How the UK reached 50,000 virus deaths.”

And then you ask this:
=#800000 “Do you have any evidence that the report from the BBC is untrue in any way? or does it just go against what you want to be true? “
Well, for the time being, I'll rely upon your statement (above).

=#800000"How likely do you think that all the nations on the earth will enthusiastically accept the findings of the WEF in January?"

Highly unlikely

So, you stated this: By the way, a direct quote not implied.
=#800000“Because cause of death is usually complicated. People actually only die of one thing and that's a lack of oxygen to the brain. The reasons for this lack of oxygen are varied and often complex. It can also be a combination of factors where even if just one wasn't present, they may have survived. Cause of death is more often than not a matter of professional judgement for the doctors.”

Are these some of the same doctors who took big pharmas bribe?

So this BBC headline and all those claims that there are 50,000 deaths from “covid” are most likely false, according to coco.
BBC......”How the UK reached 50,000 virus deaths.”

And then you ask this:
=#800000 “Do you have any evidence that the report from the BBC is untrue in any way? or does it just go against what you want to be true? “
Well, for the time being, I'll rely upon your statement (above).

=#800000"How likely do you think that all the nations on the earth will enthusiastically accept the findings of the WEF in January?"

Highly unlikely