Quote PopTart="PopTart"Personally, I'd rather have Miller than Hampshire at 6.
There is no doubt Hampshire is an athlete but its how you use it that counts and Miller is better at that in my opinion.'"
Quote PopTart="PopTart"Personally, I'd rather have Miller than Hampshire at 6.
There is no doubt Hampshire is an athlete but its how you use it that counts and Miller is better at that in my opinion.'"
Quote PopTart="Travelling Wilbury"Having read all the comments in this thread, it is very odd that our current, more senior half back in Miller, is rarely mentioned.
I think his performances towards the end of the season did pick up, as well as others.
However, I do think Hampshire does beat him with the kicking game and passing, not to mention speed. He is also a few years younger and with more time on his hands to develop further
Rocky's kicking did fall off a bit towards the end, but looking st his goal.kicking, he looks like he rushes them a bit sometimes.
With my comment on the third paragraph, is Miller guaranteed to start alongside William's, and if so, should he be?'"
They are very similar styles indeed. The way I see it, is that Miller is 28 and Hampshire is 25. Miller has had 6 seasons with us and almost all his games, probably around 150, have been played in the halves, and mainly alongside good organisers. In this time, he has had time to develop his game, but yet we still see those hospital passes coming out often, yet Hampshire has had 3 seasons with us, half the amount of games, but within those games, played in several other positions, without having a long consistency run there like others.
Don't get me wrong, in his day, Miller is as good and dangerous running half back in super league, but is very inconsistent unfortunately.
Over and above this, he is a local lad, which is useful if we ever have to juggle our quota.