You can’t have an opinion on facts.

Well somebody’s convinced him and this forum isn’t exactly awash with brain cells.

=#BF0000
“If I convert just ONE person.”
Hmm! Where have we heard that type of speech before. From Stalin just before he began to round up dissenters. From the Pope right before the Spanish inquisition, From the US government jailing Chelsea Manning in order to cover up his revelation of war crimes? Snowden for daring to reveal the growing surveillance state?

Thank goodness your only Billy Butcher with 7 posts to his name and nothing in the way of a counter argument.
That is the best way to deal with folk like me, prove me wrong, don't just complain.

PS. The war criminals still walk free. I say this often, careful what you wish for Billy.

Cuckoo Cuckoo.

You’ve been proven wrong several times over on this thread. You quickly just repost the same nonsense and hope nobody notices.

And you’d think somebody as clever as you think you are would be able to differentiate between ‘Your’ and ‘You’re’.

That's up to him.
As for the "brain cells" comment, speak for yourself.

Here is a fact to who ever it may concern.

On October 18th 2019 only weeks prior to ground zero being declared in Wuhan, China, two major events took place. One is Event 201 the other was the Military World Games. Held in none other than Wuhan, China.

One was the planning. a coincidence or an opportunity? , the other a very convenient event to introduce something nasty onto China. Again planned or a coincidence?

You have to choose which you believe because the ramifications, as we have seen, are changing our whole way of life.

Planned or a coincidence. If the latter, explain why you believe this. I, or we, have given our reasons for believing the former, now it's your turn.

But to call it a mad conspiracy theory, you need to have inside knowledge of those two events at the very least. Otherwise all you have is mere opinion, just like I have with a right to express that opinion.

I made it up on the spot. I was just teasing.

I'm still worried about you.



(no comment yet on Sweden's response to the pandemic, are you waiting for clearance ?

And now show me the several times where, were, wear I was rong, wrong. Pleez doo Billy.



As they say, put up or shut up.

So, to answer your question - coincidence.(unless you're desperate to find something else)

How many conferences over the past 10 years do you think there has been discussion about a possible pandemic ??

It may be worth asking why our Government were so poorly prepared with their response but, thats another story altogether.
There was the TWENTYFIRST (21st) conference in London earlier this year and yet, no pandemic for the previous 20

Coincidence or planned ?

Quote wrencat1873="wrencat1873"So, to answer your question - coincidence.(unless you're desperate to find something else) How many conferences over the past 10 years do you think there has been discussion about a possible pandemic ?? It may be worth asking why our Government were so poorly prepared with their response but, thats another story altogether. There was the TWENTYFIRST (21st) conference in London earlier this year and yet, no pandemic for the previous 20 Coincidence or planned ?'" So, you choose coincidence then. So you have no knowledge other than circumstantial. yet you defend them to the hilt, with no actual knowledge. . So in effect what you are saying is your posts are backed by little more than a theory ???? You say no pandemic for the previous 20 years You are right, the others didn't work out for them, this one apparently did. Check out the epidemics over your 20 year period. One or more of these could easily have developed into the one, you know THE ONE. Still, practice makes perfect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics

Quote wrencat1873="wrencat1873"So, to answer your question - coincidence.(unless you're desperate to find something else) How many conferences over the past 10 years do you think there has been discussion about a possible pandemic ?? It may be worth asking why our Government were so poorly prepared with their response but, thats another story altogether. There was the TWENTYFIRST (21st) conference in London earlier this year and yet, no pandemic for the previous 20 Coincidence or planned ?'" So, you choose coincidence then. So you have no knowledge other than circumstantial. yet you defend them to the hilt, with no actual knowledge. . So in effect what you are saying is your posts are backed by little more than a theory ???? You say no pandemic for the previous 20 years You are right, the others didn't work out for them, this one apparently did. Check out the epidemics over your 20 year period. One or more of these could easily have developed into the one, you know THE ONE. Still, practice makes perfect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics