Are the new owners offering to continue funding all the traveling expenses of teams playing them in Canada and continuing not to receive a share of Sky income.If the answer to either question is no, then the expense for clubs like ours having to pay their own travel costs while receiving reduced Sky income would cause serious problems.

Should let Toronto form two teams then they can play each other every week in the snow. Won't be long before RL have us playing on a maple leaf shaped pitch.

Not possible BLM when you're in a padded cell.....

They can't even play on their own ground until half way through the season

I read that the prospective new owner wants a share of Sky money as a proviso of his investing money into Toronto.
Also six super league clubs are against them rejoining SL, Wakefield, Cas , Salford both the Hull clubs and I think if I remember correctly Huddersfield the sixth. Leeds are for them and Saints Wigan Warrington not sure until further details were released.

Mmmmmmm! I see the clubs that are against them rejoining tend to be those that are possible fellow relegation candidates.

and they are also the ones likely to find the expense of travelling over there hit their club harder, proving that there's only a few rich enough to do it

I wouldn't say that re Hull FC.

Agree with that snowie.
Although Hull FC is probably not in that specific situation.....
Also, if they were to receive money, then that would further dilute the funding for us and other clubs.

I hope they dont let them back in not because i dont think they do add something but just for the simple fact of covid we may still be playing behind closed doors next year and restricted travel so their situation may be exactly as it is now and where does that leave the new owner financially if not able to compete again