If players are ready to come back, they play
That's not rushing them back, that's playing your best team.
Some of them might need the game time anyway, win or lose its an investment, you cannot shepherd players away from games because you think they might get injured.....that's nuts, just don't sign them in the first place.
If they need a week off or they're playing niggled, that's different, but to not play your best players if they're fit because you don't think you can win the game with or without them is.......................exactly what I expect to be reading in this forum, typical.

our attack near the line has ben the same for 3 years - 0 clue

I think it isn't as bad as though tonight we only get beat by 26 odd so our for and against still better than the teams below.
its a win!

It was slightly better than previous games and just better result wise than expected i suppose but thats where the positives end i’m afraid. Disjointed in attack, soft at times in defence and mistake-ridden again. Warrington didn’t play particularly great but still beat us easily. We have a real fight on our hands for the rest of the season. And for the sake of that i really feel Huddersfield at home next week is must win.

Just like you then.

As a Wire fan I wasn't happy with our performance.
Wakey didn't deserve to be 16-6 down at half time. The 1st 15 minutes was all Wakey.
Pauli, Tanganoa and Fifita caused us big problems and in broken play we looked all over the place. Thought G.King did well too. Brough was off based on what I know he's capable of.
A lot of messing around and lying on at the ruck
Refs control and 10 meters was sorely lacking. Couple of wrong decisions both ways. (Don't usually criticise refs). Fantastic hit on Charnley by one of your guys to stop a try (Miller?).
We deserved the win but it wasn't anywhere near as emphatic as the scoreline suggests.