Good arguments either way.

I'll agree with Chezzies decision - and reserve the right to bitch like hell if it doesn't come off

Jowitt's errors alone were not the catalyst for the poor start ! most of the team were poor so to single him out is not really fair is it?
He was out of position, playing his first game of the season at SL level and needs support not destructive, inaccurate criticism.

I don't agree with MP that it was all on him but the disrupted side was targeted and failed. He does need to be better to keep that place but he did get better in the game so he deserved at least 1 if not a number of games to get it right.
You can guarantee Hastings will target him too.

If an experienced wing became available it would put a lot of pressure on Max.

Arndell to wing- Bill has to play Centre if fit

Why would you play a centre on the wing when Bill has played in both positions?

because he is way more likely to beat players and set up opportunities than Arndell

Dont know who the new player is you've mentioned.....


He has scored when playing on the wing. The opposition will be just as scared of him there! Also it would mean that the defence on that edge would be watching Bill and opening the space for Joe Arundel.

Arundel hasn't got the pace to play wing

The difference being Jowitt has played many 1st team games. He knows what he needs to do, he shouldn’t be a rabbit in the headlights anymore. His errors put us out of reach in the 1st half which ultimately led to us losing the game. Don’t get me wrong I like Jowitt and you don’t get rookie of the year for nothing but it really was a massive fail.

Tom and Bill were no better when conceding that late try v Hull KR a few weeks back and they both are well up to speed at 1st team level.