Quote: The Avenger "Thanks SC,
I hope you’re right about the prevention of dirty tactics because without a doubt Yorkcourt will attempt anything to wriggle out of their responsibility.
Question, with regard to the Yorkcourt/Kitcost letter on the planning portal. Surely their stance is in complete contravention of the SoSs “disagregation” clause?
With the shenanigans surrounding the Newcold precedent, like the non existant legal advice, late notification & poorly explained/hidden information about its trigger point exclusion, then their assertion that they have a legal route through the planning process will be shot to pieces.'"
We think so as well but they are claiming that as the approved LDF took the land out of greenbelt then the obligations set out in the SoS consent are no longer valid. I cannot believe that the 2 planning inspectors when conducting the respective PI's would have though this but I feel its going to take the High Court or Planning Inspectorate to sort this.
It will also be interesting to see what a Judge's view is on Newcold.
The hardest part is going to be getting this to Law as you can bet your bottom dollar there will be some political manouvering to prevent this.
