Completely agree bud, hopefully our lads show up on the day. Definitely got the better backs I'd say.

Throw Sneyd and Westerman into the mix (if they pass fitness tests tomorrow) then this match is a long way short of a gimme.

I'd say if they play they'll have 12 of their starting 17 on show.

And Radford would still claim something ridiculous when we stick 30 past them!

Really? I'm not sure I can think of an example where Radders has been less than honest in his post match comments.
Even last week he was quite critical of team when he could have shrugged his shoulders and said "They're top of the league and we've got injuries".

I've always found Radford quite fair in his comments.

It doesn't really matter what team Hull puts out, we've shown what we can do at home when we put our minds to it.

I agree about Radford. I think it's the media talking about their injuries more than Radford.

There are no easy games but, with the players that they have missing, we have to be able to beat this Hull side.
Radford will have them fired up and it will be tough for the first 15/20 mins but, providing that we start the game reasonably well, our top 8 spot should be sorted on Sunday.

I think my issue with radders is he's not very good at giving credit to the other team when u guys lose in interviews

All be it I am a supporter if your team just not your coach

Bowden, Griffin, Shaul, Connor, Kelly, Green and Manu would all be in our starting 17.

It certainly will and that worries me. Far too often this season we have given teams easy points in the first half then had to chase the game.


If we make Hull have to earn every point they score we should be OK.


Also if we have any easy two points on offer, take them everytime. We had that early in the game last week, but decided to play on looking back those could have been very precious in the end.