IT was a really marginal obstruction decision and a pretty poor one by the ref imo.
Was also a real momentum shift early in the game as I thought we started ok.

It was given for obstruction.
Personally I wouldn't have given it and there were similar ones allowed the other way but he did run behind a player that blocked a tackler.

Seemed a very harsh call but i suppose technically correct. The saint's defender had committed to tackling the wakey player who then offloaded the ball to MCB who was running behind him. I highly doubt the saint's player would have got anywhere near MCB as he was already committed to another tackle, but the decision was right as the player was obstructed (through their own fault) from getting to the ball carrier. I do wonder if the game had been on Tv if he'd have let MCB score and then send it up as a no-try for the video ref to check

Remember MCB still had the full back to get round. Saints did get away with a similar move in the 2nd half but dropped the ball just after the break.

If you wanted to have a game written to order besides choosing childs to ref.

I am certain you would also have Kendal on one touch line.

Smith from Wigan doing the other.

Without doubt these three have really put in some controversial stints against us this season.
When I saw them all come out together on Sunday I could not believe our bad luck.

What did luck have to do with it ? More like "a cunning plan"