Why does it say if we can purswaid WT to become anchor tenants.Do we need purswaiding.

Thats one for Chris and Michael but I guess it all comes down to the terms of the tenancy which as far as I am aware have not been discussed with the Club.

Depending on a number of factors:

• Location
• Rent
• Conditions
• Other involved parties

We may very well need persuading.
On the other hand, it could be perfect and our holy grail.

I guess time will tell.

oh ffsake...



So MC has to knock back the new Stadium offer after the conditions under which it is to be built and run are altered beyond the financial viability originally agreed.
This makes Rod happy, he doesn't have to deliver the stadium that the Bermuda triangle didn't want to build in the first place and conveniently shifts the blame for that to WT's doorstep.
Full WExpress back page spread.......Rod throws his arms in the air and say's, I tried my best, its all Trinity's fault the stadium won't be built.

Or he agrees to the altered terms, gets a stadium built in the community, when it's built says that the rental agreement is too high and is unfeasible then plays the same game he's already playing with Belle Vue to get the rent lower. The difference would be that Yorkcourt would be a bit more pliable as they'd have just spent several million building a stadium so anything would be better than nothing for them.

You're assuming the terms will be viable on some level.

If you didn't want to build it, what would you do ?

Depends how long the lease would be signed for and whether there would be a break clause at any point.

For what it's worth (nothing), that's how I imagine it playing out too.

This may not be the case of course. Until we hear from our intrepid leader, we won't know which way the wind is blowing.

All we have at the moment are hearsay and conjecture. But then as Aristotle postulated, nature abhors a vacuum.

I just can't see why he would set up a new Trust just so he can shift the blame to the club. He's had a long involvement with the club and presumably wants to see a stadium built. The issue is to what extent he benefits, and to what extent the club suffers a detriment, due to the establishment of a new Trust.

I think this is just pessimism filling a vacuum. I don't think MC would allow the club to be shafted. He's shown that a few times in recent years. It might be that the terms aren't quite as great, but it has to be better than the many alternatives.

They will not build it until terms are agreed.

I smell a rodent.