thought he was close to MoM
Hull will have long term plans for him I would imagine, given the age profile of their back row.

I'm not shocked he did well, very hard working player, rarely misses a tackle and runs stringly. I was surprised he went out on loan, particularly with Ellis out and Watts banned, all the pre season talk was on him in our 17 to replace Pritchard, but got injured in pre season which set him back.

I reckon with Easter coming up he will be back at us after an initial loan he will be back at Hull, good to see him doing well and it benefits both teams.

Thats good when you consider Dean has been out with a hip injury for 6 weeks and that would have been his first game back.

Actually, thinking about it, maybe he wasn't that good. Should probably leave him here a bit longer. You don't need him for now do you?

You can't argue with topping the tackle count when you're on loan at club you have no affinity with. Thought he did very well.

Very average. What was wrong with playing bachelor annikin molloy (is he fit?)

Very true batch should be over him and kirmond. No disrespect to kirmond as he has been a great servant but he is spent, and offers little and has so for too long now.

It's comments like this that make me wonder what game people are watching.
Annakin and Molloy are nowhere near Hadley and Batchelor is a pup and can only get better.
Hadley runs some great lines, it's just we're not on the same wavelength.

Hadley is a Loan player and kirmond for the last two seasons has been poor. For me Hadley is decent and played well, though how can he justify taking batch's place in the first team when although young has played commendable

Because at this moment Hadley is a better player than Batch