People don't get charged a whim! On a passing comment by a player!

The review panel have obviously seen something hence he's been charged. And he will get a 4-8 game ban on top of his current ban.

Face it, he's let you down big style here.

Oh give over you myopic oaf. If Moore is guilty then fine he deserves a ban, but that's not proven yet is it!

What is strange and up for debate is the delay in citing him, wouldn't you find that strange if Ah Van was suddenly investigated a week after the Gibson tackle after say he had been let off during the game. Sounds to me like the vile Betts has been acting up again.

You have a lot to be proud of at Widnes, even Ah Van's not a bad lad. However I'd be ashamed to have that big stupid patheic mean spirited petty vindictive fat headed bufoon Betts as Coach, wouldn't you?

Sound like the RFL are trying to placate the moaning git Betts to me.

Has he been found guilty and if so what's the outcome?

Why wasn't it seen last week when reviewed. Do the RFL normally go back to reviewing a match they already reviewed the week before? What other examples of this happening?

None, seems to be reserved for just us - what a surprise.

I'm not a conspriracy nut but this strinks of Betts moaninng and bitterness.

What new evidence has come to light that was not there when the panel first reviewed it? so perhaps he won't get a 4-8 week ban as you insist, maybe it's you what needs remove your personal feelings from the matter and let the panel decide.

Nothing to do with Ah van then

I agree, see the end of my last post to why Betts would complain he knows one of us will not make the 8.
I haven't defended Scott Moore in anyway and if he is proven guilty with sufficient evidence he deserves his suspension - letting us down in the process but how a review panel who have already failed to go back and review games where Dave Taylor, Danny Brough for example have caused injuries to players clearly makes you wonder if they do fully review games. At the minute the disciplinary is a farce half of the time they can't even get the players name right.

I have no personal view, I haven't seen the incident to have one.

No idea why it has taken a week but to be honest that's irrelevant, he was banned anyway.

Not sure what Ah Van has to do with Scott Moore 'allegedly gouging, but I'll add it to the list of those who are to blame. Not going over that tackle again and no other player has been accused of it, regardless of what the players thought of the tackle - is that how you should respond?

This isn't a serious post, is it? Really?

So because it doesn't suit your myopic opinion it can't be serious?
I thought you were being a genuine RLFan, not a troll. Seriously.

I am, seriously.

But Betts is being blamed in this thread more than Scott Moore is. Only one person up in front of the panel.