Whilst we didn't lose that field position, we weren't 8 points up like we could've been had we not taken the 2 points. Simple errors lost us that game.

Some positives to take from the game though, Sio being the biggest positive for me.

Very true, but quite a few of these players were not part of Webster's team were they? Still too many errors at crucial points in games are costing us, that part hasn't improved under BS, although under JW there weren't many occasions when we got close enough to teams to make those errors!

A massive over reaction from some, one other thread entitled Relegation confirmed or similar.
We played poorly in 1st half, and in 2nd played well for most of it but were undone by a few silly errors. Its also true that Salford played poorly in 2nd half but had enough quality to take the chances they got. if we can get our game together for 80 mins instead of just the 40 we'll be ok

The problem is we have been working on this for over two months, we have changed the squad but the outcome remains the same. We start badly then improve only to fade again. The only difference is that we get a little closer before they pull away.

Just read Brian Smith's comments following the Salford game: www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/sport ... -1-7400985 Does anybody who went have an idea what he meant by 'plenty of other stuff' and all that?

Just read Brian Smith's comments following the Salford game: www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/sport ... -1-7400985 Does anybody who went have an idea what he meant by 'plenty of other stuff' and all that?

I assume he is referring to the fact they were "very clever" and didn't give a penalty away for the whole first half.
I didn't feel it was as bad as some of the poor reffing we've had but there were things that could have been pulled up that wasn't.
Chase hitting out at Miller for a start and a few scruffy play the balls but that's just how it goes. They got their field position from the penalties we conceded so I'm sure that would have frustrated him.