Quote: Scarlet Pimpernell "I Would of thought that if the current board had to pay for the stands it would be a positive for them because it would explain why they had to make such swingeing cuts. I don't see anything negative in that but I think some of you are jumping to your friends defence without reading my post. I would also point out that I have not lowered myself to ending each post with an insult.'"
e swingeing cuts had to be made due to the club spending more cash than was coming through the metaphoric till.
If not Glover and Elston would still be here ??
IIRC we were told that Glover had "loaned" money to pay for the stands and it was a condition of the new board taking over that this loan was not to be called in.
Whether this still shows somewhere in the clubs accounts, I've no idea.