Quote:
Scarlet Pimpernell "Quote: Scarlet Pimpernell "How many second rowers do we have?
How many outside backs do we have?'"
This is irrelevant it's not where he plays but why he was released. If it was the former I would think Kirke would be a better bet. I read they had decided that they were not going to offer him a contract if that was the reason then you could add the majority of the squad who are out of contract with no indication of any new offers being made. To release a quota spot then look at removing Locke until it can be confirmed he will be back this season.
I would guess it was the best option to save money because let's face it this is the major motivation at the moment.
We enter our last guaranteed SL game on Sunday having played our worst season' with only a small number signed for next season and no ground.'"
You release Kirke and who is the 'domestic' player that comes in and replaces him?
Don't you think this option has already been explored, with the signings of Howarth, Tansey and Walker?
So I would say it's very relevant.
As for Locke being removed, maybe that will come later on, if the club has a replacement lined up?
Give the bloke a chance because if he did get released with no replacement, you would be moaning at that!
