Quote: bren2k "The article in the this week's WE does little to help; it totally fails to mention the developers obligation under the S106 agreement, or the loss of community sports facilities that their skulduggery represents; two important points that could have got the non WTW supporting public interested in the story.
I'm guessing that the WE ether didn't research it properly, or just weren't fussed enough about the story to do a decent job.'"
The WE article was exactly what we did want. Not many understand the whole picture, but there wouldn't be much a need for a meeting if we just put it all in the paper first!
It should be a good evening, whatever it is we know by then!