Two years running Wakefield have been shafted by officials, playing Saints at BV and Cunningham thinks his team were "mugged".

Of course, you wouldn't expect anything other than a one eyed view in the local paper but, some of his comments are just comical.
He could be the new Jonny Vegas !

Notice that he didn't mention his team saving a try with a blatant trip. Mind you, all of the officials, that were biased in favour of Wakefield, missed that as well .

l
Lost respect for Cunningham after the Stosic incident.

That's a shame for Saints - they've generally operated at a class above some other clubs, but if they allow Cunningham to talk to the media like that on a regular basis, they'll end up coming across like Wigan.

Note - we actually lost the game, and James Webster has conducted no such churlish interview...

And now theyre saying it was a slip so was only a penalty, so I guess that's an admission they got it wrong

"The officials didn’t see a problem with it - but how has Mark split his eye open and suffered damage to his tear duct, which is inside his eye?"
Glad he put a question mark at the end of this quote - your tear duct is not "inside your eye".
Back to the anatomy lessons...

I overheard the commentators from BBC Radio Lancashire state "A controversial win for St Helens" in their post match summary. Given their mandate is to be slightly bias toward the Lancashire side for obvious reasons then I can safely assume that even they must agree that the decisions were very much in St's favour!