Here goes the story as I understand it. Sammut asked not to play against Bradford, wakefield said your joking aren't you!! He was selected and the coaches thought he bottled several tackles against Bradford (I didn't go so didn't see the incidents). He was then dropped for the incident and shipped out to fev on dual reg (they can't afford to sign him this year hence the dual reg).

Or the coach upon resigning Smith believed it would be better in the time available to play him in partnership with Sykes. He probably also feels Mathers is the best option at full back therefore until one is injured why will he change a winning team. This is what you have all been demanding all season and now the new coach is you are all becoming paranoid looking for something that is not there. If correct he is going to Featherstone to keep match fit just like many other SL clubs do with their players. It was not that long ago that Charnley from Wigan was playing in the championship.

Sammutt has been dropped by the Head Coach of WAkefield Trinity Wildcats who happens to select the team.

End of story.

Over & out.

Don't think you should be taring us all with same brush.
Talking like you are a school master to a class of naughty children is not helping you.
There are some of us who much to your dislike, are not totally daft!

If that's the case then fair enough. I must say his twitter account is full of Bradford stuff and he did say he hoped they beat Huddersfield at magic weekend !!?? However all I want is the reason he is not playing - if it's for said reasons then fair enough or if he's not selected cos of form then I have to accept that but there is NO commemt from the club thus far and the press statements seem to be incorrect on the last twice occasion ie injury and on loan to Fev !!

Give it a rest he has been dropped !!!!!

I think either the pressure of managing Chelsea or the sun has got to you.

Why don't you go have a lay down in a darkened room.

I will !! After watching England I'm burnt out though I might managed them sooooooon !! ;0)

But why? Was that not what agar was doing, fitting a player in for the sake of it, the 2 teams Webster has picked have had balance so why unbalance it to fit in a player who is currently living off reputation. Also we know smith/Sykes works most of the time.

Again what pace and skill - I know he's got it or had it but i haven't seen it with us even if you have. Let's be clear about this Aussie players have far more pressure and expectation on their shoulders and rightly so. They are highly paid and take British players jobs which is fine but they must deliver - no excuses in their case - that's the price they pay. And I don't care how bad the team has been he has nowhere near justified his place at the club (as an import). So thanks but I will bag him because he has been poor, should he be fortunate enough to get another chance to play for this great club I hope he proves me wrong.

Of course he could but, why would Webster do that when Sykes and Smith are going so well in the halves.
It's a no brainer.
In the same way that it was wrong to move half the team around to accommodate Seyjka, it would be wrong to "find a spot" for Sammut, just so that he is in the ream.
IF he is the best choice for any position, then play him there but, if not, don't select him, similar to putting Mathers on the wing, which was also a poor decision, by Agar.

Let's cut Webster some slack.
Sunday was the first time since the London away fixture, that we looked like a half decent SL team.

Am I missing something?
Where does it say officially Sammutt has gone to Fev on loan?