Foxy got off to a solid start this year but last year I recall he was being blamed for single handedly losing us games! I was led to believe he was a Elston signing on a large wedge, so some sort of settlement must have been reached?

I don't think it's strange to praise Fox for what he did at Wakefield, although I accept his first spell here was better. Perhaps he had better service then and a centre who didn't leave him in no mans land defensively.
Just think it a bit of a shambles that everybody and their auntie seems to know he has gone but still no announcement from the club.
We don't know what has gone on behind the scenes so it's no use speculating but if he has left because his standard of rugby has fallen then the exit door must be open for one or two more.

No Daddycool to refute such rumours these days I've noticed.

I've heard he as gone to Batley for........






a tin of biscuits ! Boom-boom....... I'll get me coat.

So if that's the case, why didn't we keep Fox and use the money to pay Agar off?

Take it he hasn't gone then and he will be in the squad on Sunday
for Riley who won't be allowed to play?

Journalism relies on tip offs. Get some right, get some wrong. Doesn't do the journlist any favours if they get it wrong.

Don't think its a Foxy love in its a fact that he is better than what we are using instead of him.I always winced when the high ball went up to Foxy you never knew if he would take it or drop it.The one thing you cant knock him for was his effort going forward to take the weight off the forwards or going for the try line.Dont think Im alone in wondering why Agar has put Mathers on the wing and not kept Foxy ? strange indeed.

A brave winger that aint bothered about a thump going over the line.
Hes scored some really gutsy trys

Not much further from Batley.

So Mathers on one wing and Owen on the other. Great management that is! Warrington are going to rack up a cricket score.