Quote: M62 J30 TRINITY "What was the other option to Agar? Millward? that would have ended well. There wasn't much moaning going on the end of his first season in charge, last season no doubt the off field stuff effected the squad. This season at the end of sept we didn't think we'd have a squad to compete, now we have a team that I feel is better than last seasons but overseas players only arriving 2 weeks ago 1 still to arrive Sammut and Scruton just signed, we will click and us supporters will be there supporting the lads.
Trinity Forever'"
Keep Kear was the option. Time for a change we were told. Well, change is great if you have a viable option. I don't know how much Kear wanted to go. We were sold the 'by mutual agreement' line. Frankly, I feel he was pushed out. It was a big mistake. I find it interesting that quite a lot of the people on here who sneer at Kear's record and how we used to play are often those who plead for more time for Agar and make excuse after excuse for him. Kear had players sold from under him too. Kear had back room troubles too; most coaches at Wakefield have. We had some bad perfomances at times under Kear, I know that, but, on average, we were a far more solid and dependable, professional unit, pound for pound spent in my humble opinion..and so many of those who say support support support, when something is plainly very wrong with the way that team is being run, have no respect for Kear's achievements and overlook the fact, in my opinion, that we would have been a better place now if he had stayed. We chucked him out like an old boot. I for one will always be grateful for what he achieved and wish to God we had him back, because this buffoon doesn't know a Rugby League player from a hairdresser, which frankly, Lyne and Mathers would be better suited at