Quote: Old Blighty "I agree PC concepts have been taken too far, like many other methodologies created to achieve parity and justice there are those who have missused and corrupted the intent. I agree that accountability is blurred (i have never known a time where it wasnt) but that should not be a shield for the blame and litigation culture that pervades society todey...
What you miss in your argument is respect... where is that...? in all its faces...
I am sure left at that, you would say that respect has to be earned... and I would retort that it is impossible to earn the respect of those who have prejudice against you.
All have the right to comment, believe something and be vocal but no one has the right to bear prejudice.
(p.s. that was fun to write, quite cathartic!!)'"
I had to read it twice to understand that actually what you are writing has little to do with the original post unless of course you assume it was made due to prejudice rather than reason. I am not saying you are wrong because I feel certain players receive excessive criticism not because of how they play but who they are and how over time this becomes to some the way it should be. It is in a lesser form the reincarnation of the theory portrayed in the novel 1984. The doctoring of free speech is replaced by it is Fox for example therefore he is at fault they fail to see the effort he puts in over the course of the game, rather they focus on he cannot catch the high ball despite on many occasions last season not having any protection seen at other clubs.
I suppose this could be prejudice not resulting from any one event but due to the premise of the protection of the group rather than the individual "to quote Spock the needs of the many out way the needs of the one" so you could say I have disproved my own theory.