I am fine for shirts after all I have supported the club for many years and have acquired quite a few along the way.

Oh yes i forgot!!

I know it may come as a surprise but there was a club before super league. You tell us how long you have supported the club because you appear to think everything should have the same commitment. This is despit the fact I would think many on here have been through much more with WT both good and bad than you.

I'm not 100% sure what you are trying to get at?

I notice you do not answer the question so to make it easier for you to understand how long have you been a supporter.

About 32 years i would say.
And your point is?

Wow thats some high level "double standarding" you've got going on!!
The amount of questions youve failed to answer is...i cant think of a suitable word for once, such is the shock of this comment!!

Your old enough to know then that it is not a wise move to accept anything the people who run WT say. I note that the club did manage to obtain some press space for the shop being closed despite it being advertised as open.
I am not going over the answers I have given many times before just look them up. I note that you are still to provide any evidence as to the amounts of money trousered by Mrs Elston. I guess the fact she was employed by the club resulted in her getting a salary, not exactly earth shattering, I suppose she may have put some of it in her trouser pockets so I guess that's what you mean.

Is it tomorrow that there's the ST presentation?

Can we all assume that in this context Sarah Elston got paid appropriately as agreed by her employer whether you agree with the amount or not.
Let's not use the phrase "trousered" any more. It is misleading.
I'm assuming the poster who first used it meant "earned" rather than anything untoward.

If you don't agree, please don't post it on here as the allegation would certainly go against AUP.

I agree some of the posts have been somewhat unwise which I think I pointed out. I presume therefore that you are referring to your fellow moderator who chose to use this questionable phrase.