Well done at least you read my post which makes a change rather than assuming what I write is negative. I note that you do not answer my question regarding KH so I presume you have no idea what contribution she has made.

I feel you prove my point if the only time you go out is to a Wakefield Trinity related event the winter months must drag but it does explain your interest in computers. I doubt you will be able to ask a question face to face but you may be able to write one on a piece of paper unless of course they remember to bring a microphone along with them.

I suppose I had better make the post subject related because I don't want to be accused by one of the moderators of deviating from the thread so why don't you ask him "if he thinks that London, should they go into administration will be demoted to Championship 1" I know not a good question but thread related and you never know I may be at the meeting to hear the answer.

When is Al getting banned of here?

I can't see Feath being an option, the RFL have never come across as liking two SL clubs in the WF postcode so doubt they would be up for three!

I think it makes it look like a very poorly supported sport too!

As does a half empty wembley for a double header involving allegedly three of the best teams in the world.

Lets be honest. The tragic week end was first introduced to take the game to the public hopefully in increased numbers. That hasn't worked.
When first introduced their was no leaders shield and no promotion or relegation. It must be a level playing field, and nothing other than playing each other home and away should effect relegation.
We are often told that the players would prefer to play less games in a season, and because the SL have been allowed to become the b all and end all of our sport that's the outcome.
We only have two events that the teams can get involved in, and a sponsor for the SL can not be found.
Forget, scrap the weekend if Promotion and relegations going to play a part in the future make up of RL.

65000 isn't half empty Kinley.
Having said that there was a mass exodus just before HT in the Aus Fiji game.
In hindsight, they should have put the Aus game on first.

Don't think it takes hindsight its just plain common sense to run with that game first.

Don't think the league will pull the plug on London.
Don't London have a decent junior network going now and this will be put forward to the RFL.
London will probably looking for franchising again to develop these emerging juniors without the threat of relegation.
If this does happen, maybe a club like Wake can keep an eye on how things develop at London.
It's a big step to do what London have done but they weren't getting where they wanted to be with imports, so maybe they are looking to use the franchise system as it should be used.
Just my opinion.

Put those too fixtures on at RU in a double header and you couldn't find a stadium big enough to take the capacity.
We are where we are!

To put it into context:
73,631 - Great Britain vs Australia, Wembley 1992
70,204 - Australia vs England, SCG 1932
70,174 - Australia vs Great Britain, SCG 1962
68,777 - Australia vs Great Britain, SCG 1958
68,720 - Australia vs Great Britain, SCG 1958
67,748 - Australia vs France, SCG 1955
67,577 - Australia vs Great Britain, SCG 1954
67,545 - England vs New Zealand/Australia vs Fiji, Wembley 2013 (this weekends double header)
67,009 - Australia vs France, SCG 1951
66,540 - England vs Australia, Wembley 1995

We can and should do better.