Quote: Tricky2309 "I support the club not AG or JE and whilst I am grateful for AG buying the club at the time he did, I don't think that makes him immune from criticism . Clearly, he has done some good things but equally there are still signs that the club has not been run as well as it should be. I seem to recall after last years issue with the tax man we were told it was an admin error and it wouldn't happen again, yet here we are facings a winding up order from them.
The attitude of hmrc is well known and this is one bill that any business needs to keep on top of. They appear to be heading in the right direction with the appointments of people with a financial background, but why was that not done after the last oversight?
In summary I believe that far from doom mongering the comments on previous threads turned out to be pretty accurate and as someone else said we would not know what we do know had the club not felt the need to respond to the speculation and IMO valid questions raised.
I also think that by and large people have taken on board the contents of AG statement and have a more understanding view of some of the reasons why we are in the position we are.'"
I'm not saying that AG or JE are immune from any criticism. I just feel more recognition for what they have done in the past 18 months (new roof on the north stand, opening a proper shop in a shopping centre instead of the IKEA-esque hut we had before etc.) Like stated in his Q&A the finances have taken a hit with not playing the Leeds home game. The feeling is that if we had cas earlier in the season instead of London and Leeds wasn't called off, and obviously we had a sponsor who didn't fiddle taxes, we wouldn't be in a situation where people can doom-monger at all.