I personally think that Beer and Gambling is a bad idea just because I don't think it penetrates our target markets. I think we should aim more for a sponsor that would attract people from darn sarth such as insurance companies etc. that way we'd get more than money from the sponsor.

Also Aviva throw £5 million a year at union, even though they have lower viewing figures and a lower aggregate attendance. It surely doesn't take a genius to see that we should be looking for that kind of money with our viewing figures and attendances.

I've seen loads - 5 in one day on the M62 going to Liverpool and back.

The question is, does / has it netted any material gain - fans / sponsors / money - and the answer is probably 'very little'

Quote: TRB "I've seen loads - 5 in one day on the M62 going to Liverpool and back. The question is, does / has it netted any material gain - fans / sponsors / money - and the answer is probably 'very little' www.loverugbyleague.com/news_978 ... um=twitter says here that tv audiences were up 45%, and attendances were up, how much we can attribute to the deal, I don't think we can tell...

Quote: TRB "I've seen loads - 5 in one day on the M62 going to Liverpool and back. The question is, does / has it netted any material gain - fans / sponsors / money - and the answer is probably 'very little' www.loverugbyleague.com/news_978 ... um=twitter says here that tv audiences were up 45%, and attendances were up, how much we can attribute to the deal, I don't think we can tell...

How about the Bradford bulls super league? Afterall there the only club that matter!

Maybe Engage are coming back?
Just with Silverwood had Engage sponsor on his shirt on Monday night..?

i think we now know why stobart have been "given the push", the rfl need some sponsorship money for the league so they can pay their players to take part....