Quote Rhino Roy="Rhino Roy"do you seriously think that a head coach would not be aware of such an issue before the CEO ?
I think now the people have been advised of their bans, there may me a can of worms opened'"
i think your point kind of misses the point, or maybe it just shows your inability to understand what information has been released. there is no suggestion that agar was or wasn't aware of the issue following the test. however rule has been banned for his handling of the situation. until we know what that handling was, then it's best to shut up.
there has been no suggestion that agar acted in any way that was not appropriate. personally i think the judgement raises more questions than it answers, i would like to know just how james rule managed to incurr a two year ban - the mind boggles as to what the daft bugger was playing at.