Jesus Christ, good job we didn't sign him www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... story.html

Jesus Christ, good job we didn't sign him www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... story.html

No suprise there

Apparently they could be more to come out too

Interested to know what James Rule did to warrant his ban.

I know they've stated mishandling the situation but to ban him for that doesn't make sense so there has to be more to it.

It will be interesting to see what Agar's take on this

This will be interesting to see when all is confirmed - wonder how/why the Player, Conditioner and Chief Exec are implicated and banned but the Head Coach or his Assistant/s have no knowledge or involvement ?
Not trying to imply anything just stating the obvious, and curious and interested to see what follows.
Shame such a fantastic player is likely to be remembered more for the negatives in his personal life and what he did off the field than what he could do and achieved on it.
I hope after the psychological/mental health issues we have seen and experienced with other players in trouble he is a strong character with good support regardless of what wrong doing may have occured.

let's see how the likes of smith and cockayne behave this year before we climb on board our high horses.

You say you are not trying to imply anything, but then say you are stating the obvious.

How is it stating the obvious? Many things happen in different walks of life where people you would think do know something but don't.

How many people have done things throughout history without the knowledge of the people closest to them?

Perhaps your current coach knew about the the betting scandal in 2004 involving Long and Gleeson, after all

Given the people who have received ban's, it would be surprising if the coach knew nothing of this.

That is correct, it is possible none of the coaching staff were aware of something internaly that went on between a conditioner and a player, that is why it is a question, you would think for the situation to escalate to a level where the CEO was aware of possible wrong doing the coaching staff would be also - that is where i feel it is 'obvious', we are not talking about a massive multi-national company where the people in question work in different sites in the country/world we are talking about a super league club based in Hull !

You are also correct, our current coach may have been aware of things involving players within his departent at the time also when the scandal you refer to happened - im not the one looking to score points or getting defensive about my teams current coach.

If you read the complete post i have more concern for the person/people in question, to be more specific after what happened to Terry Newton, not that im trying to 'imply' this is what will happen to Martin Gleeson just showing 'obvious' concern.

Of course the coach would know that he'd failed a drugs test. however my guess is that if the ceo decided on a corporate stance for the club to take in terms of statments to the public, then agar would be obliged to keep quiet and tow the party line.

there will be speculation that the conditioner was up to no good, and that rule's management of the situation was shoddy at best.

it's fat boy rule that's been suspended along with a conditioner, there is nothing whatsoever implied or otherwise, to suggest any hint of wrong doing by agar. even those (like me) that didn't want him at belle vue cannot reasonably conclude anything else.

he's here, and i hope he makes a decent fist of it.

It's more than possible that only the player & conditioner knew of this and that when the tish was about to hit the fan the first person to be informed by the RFL of a failed drugs test was the Chief Exec.

It's likely, if that was the case, that the rest of the staff including the coach were then bound by confidentiality under instruction from the CE.