Darlington moved to a new state of art super stadium which is better than anything in superleague other than the KC.
Unfortunately the team is going down and down and the 27000 seater stadium only has about 1500 supporters in on match days. Darlington FC can't afford the upkeep on the ground, which they don't own and the latest proposal is to demolish this 6 year old stadium and move to a ground more suited to their requirements - ie their old ground.
It now looks as though that ground's owners, Darlington Cricket Club are looking to clear the site of teh old football ground so Darlington FC could go out of existence and nobody would probably notice.
If we want to play in a superb ground next season, this one is only an hour's drive from Wakefield and we could claim expansionist rights.
This is a salutory lesson to any club chasing a new ground at the expense of everything else.
I'm calm old love don't you worry. when an imoticon is your only answer it's clear you don't have one, your just a bit of an old fake really aye Brenny boy. Think you will find that's the one you wanted to make a pair oh another one.
Quote: vastman "I'm calm old love don't you worry.
If you expected a SmokeyTA style, split-quote analysis of your lengthy post, you were always going to be disappointed.
I'm far from an AG poodle though, nor do I believe that all of the clubs problems have been magically solved by the new regime. I am however, enthusiastic about the small changes that have happened so far and I like the optimism that seems to have built around the place; I just wish it had happened a few years ago, before the rot set in and we started the inexorable journey towards administration.
I maintain that your original post decrying AG and listing his failures in respect of the NM project was needlessly negative and, given your subsequent semi-retractions, lacking substance. You're on the verge of doing to AG what you accuse others of doing to Ted and in so doing, your credibility suffers.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Think you will find that's the one you wanted to make a pair 
oh another one.
once again it would seem vasty has left you speechless, which judging by this forum is no mean achievement 
