|
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > O/T crusaders v bulls |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1652 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2012 | Sep 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Not sure what facts you are dealing in as there were 6 Welsh-born players in the 19 man squad for Saturday's game.'" ]
Maybe but only 3 played(Jordan James is English born).
But will these 3 get a game once the other overseas players arrive???
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4171 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2023 | Oct 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: headhunter "
never got in to an argument with you numpty, it would give me headache thinking down to your mental capacity.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: headhunter "For the umpteenth time, I am not a Crusaders fan. The club obviously has a business plan of some sort, I personally have no interest in it because it doesn't concern me at all, just as it doesn't concern you. If the home attendances aren't good enough to survive then the club will go bust, I don't understand why you are getting so wound up about the fact that they are not. The club weren't 'fast tracked', they were in the NL1 final in the year that they were promoted and so would have gone up even with automatic promotion and relegation. The club that year also had one of the highest average crowds in that league, they averaged more than Leigh. I would like to know how you feel Wakefield are performing '100% better' than Crusaders. Last year Wakefield's average crowd was only 1,300 higher than Crusaders' even with the games in Neath included. The club is far weaker on the field, has far poorer facilities and certainly are not in a stronger position financially. You could not argue that any 'NL1' clubs are better than Crusaders, because it's clear that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, and are desperately looking for someone else to blame for the failure of your club. And I'll state it again in case you missed it
1) please god let it be of interest to the RFL.
2) unless their bailed out by the RFL.
3) they were allowed more overseas players, their travel expenses were met by the RFL, because it suited the current RFL mandate of expansion at all costs.
4) how many paid?
As for us being 100% stronger,
Gates higher TICK
Our supporters spend more at away grounds adding value TICK
Our SL record is better overall TICK
We have award winning Community Dept TICK
We have league winning Academy Team TICK
for SL 2012 we have probably one of the best stadiums in SL TICK
and if Crusaders were declined they help received from the RFL they would have gone bust, we weren't offered any help and still survived so i would assume that must make us stronger financially if only because we didn't run up crusaders massive debt TICK
Featherstone Rovers are a better bet as are Batley and Halifax, all have won the necessary trophy'
s, all have better business plans and i would suspect all have more paying supporters.
It will be interesting to see by decision time the respective attendances for both clubs because i would wager there will be more than 1300 average difference.
Don't take this as being petty, its just applying logic, and its not personally aimed at Crusaders, as most of these are points are applicable to London also.
Am i bitter? if we go down because a poorer team is wanted more than us, you bet.
Out of interest, who do you support?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3840 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: kinleycat "1) please god let it be of interest to the RFL.
2) unless their bailed out by the RFL.
3) they were allowed more overseas players, their travel expenses were met by the RFL, because it suited the current RFL mandate of expansion at all costs.
4) how many paid?
As for us being 100% stronger,
Gates higher TICK
Our supporters spend more at away grounds adding value TICK
Our SL record is better overall TICK
We have award winning Community Dept TICK
We have league winning Academy Team TICK
for SL 2012 we have probably one of the best stadiums in SL TICK
and if Crusaders were declined they help received from the RFL they would have gone bust, we weren't offered any help and still survived so i would assume that must make us stronger financially if only because we didn't run up crusaders massive debt TICK
Featherstone Rovers are a better bet as are Batley and Halifax, all have won the necessary trophy'
s, all have better business plans and i would suspect all have more paying supporters.
It will be interesting to see by decision time the respective attendances for both clubs because i would wager there will be more than 1300 average difference.
Don't take this as being petty, its just applying logic, and its not personally aimed at Crusaders, as most of these are points are applicable to London also.
Am i bitter? if we go down because a poorer team is wanted more than us, you bet.
Out of interest, who do you support?'"
I agree with everything that you say but we all know the Crusaders will be in SL next season.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Surely we are in a financial better position than Crusaders. We don't owe anyone any cash now. You owe the RFL 700k!
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 5086 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: headhunter "For the umpteenth time, I am not a Crusaders fan. The club obviously has a business plan of some sort, I personally have no interest in it because it doesn't concern me at all, just as it doesn't concern you. [sizeIf the home attendances aren't good enough to survive then the club will go bust, I don't understand why you are getting so wound up about the fact that they are not[/size. The club weren't 'fast tracked', they were in the NL1 final in the year that they were promoted and so would have gone up even with automatic promotion and relegation. The club that year also had one of the highest average crowds in that league, they averaged more than Leigh. I would like to know how you feel Wakefield are performing '100% better' than Crusaders. Last year Wakefield's average crowd was only 1,300 higher than Crusaders' even with the games in Neath included. The club is far weaker on the field, has far poorer facilities and certainly are not in a stronger position financially. You could not argue that any 'NL1' clubs are better than Crusaders, because it's clear that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, and are desperately looking for someone else to blame for the failure of your club. And I'll state it again in case you missed it
And then be bailed out again by the RFL at the expense of money that should be being spent in other areas of the game.
Add to that the fact that the RFL (I think it was Nigel Wood but I can't be sure) have said that going into administration will affect our bid, but yet everyone knows that the same course of action will not have any effect whatsoever on Crusaders bid.
This is why we are bitter towards Crusaders/The RFL. I agree our problems are of our own making but it doesn't make the clear bias demonstrated by the powers that run our game any less annoying/frustrating.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
8.7587890625:5
|
| |