look at widnes last time round, they were bought out but still didn't get a license. the rfl can't just simply allow this sort of thing to happen and just let clubs get away with it. Crusaders are a different case as they are an expansion club.
If Wakefield enter administration, which I would think is fairly certain. and the rfl grant them a license they will be staring at a hefty law suit from the widnes camp

cas will get their groud admitted in the coming months and construction will begin, setting their bid up nicely, cas ATM are run great as a club on and off the field, surely Wakefield have no bearing on their bid at all. it's merely optimistic Wakefield fans trying to sleep at night

how exactly? by the time the next licenses are handed out how exactly are wakefield going to be in a better position that other clubs?
you said that the rules had changed since widnes were refused?

widnes weren't in administration when they applied, so the rule change hasn't anything to do with that. I imagine Wakefield won't be in administration for long but it's still lingering over them, and the reason why widnes were refused was because there was little evidence to prove the club was a sable company and could survive in super league.

Sorry but the clues are in my original response to your post. Licence is for the next 3 years by the time the applications are submitted if rumours are true we will have extremely wealthy new backer(s), an agreement to play out of a SL stadium and NM progressing in the background. This coupled with the community department etc.. will IMO mean we have one of the best 14 bids and on that basis cannot be kicked out.

I have not missed out the other points I was commenting on the crusaders point. As for the other points, we are yet to see what happens with a new owner, and any promises they might make.

id give it a rest pal, your not gonna get a bite today!


Come on the Trin!!!!!!!!

She is younger than that mate and never wears an orange vest top to the office... so I understand!