FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Newmarket - Hugely Significant Development! |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 16 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2012 | Apr 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: danny boy1 "The worry if that happens, is that the developer wouldn't need to use WTWC and the stadium as a trojan horse in order to get planning through and could save themselves millions (watch your backs)'"
I've never even thought of this, but that is very worrying. I think we all know our stadium was a sweetener for the units. Yorkcourt can just wait till 2012 and build all their units without needing to spend 20 million on our stadium! I wouldn't be suprised now if they withdraw the current planning application and sit and wait for the LDF to be approved.
I hope I am wrong, but I've got a very bad feeling about this now.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
43457_1320063455.jpg READ THE AUP:
//forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_43457.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5507 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16551_1431692096.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_16551.jpg |
|
| Quote: Willzay "and also, there is a similar significant development in the prop foward signing'"
Significant in that we aren't signing one I take it.
If we get as far as the start of the season its going to be a long one.
rlhttps://www.wakefieldexpress.co.uk/sport/wakefield-wildcats/troubled_wakefield_wildcats_shelve_new_signings_1_2926021rl
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: rugbyball "IA you are right they do seem to have backed themselves into a corner. And as you keep telling us the previous government and their officers have made Wakefield find 95ha for warehousing, and and all the facts seem to suggest this was a tall order with the limited amount of land available to do this. So perhaps THIS government and its officers will help Wakefield with the burden and Lower the amount of land required for Warehousing.
It will take an act of Parliament to reverse this and that is not going to happen in this parliamentary term and I doubt it will ever happen. Economic growth is still the key driver of the current Coalition plan to cut the state.
The officers are the same people, they have not changed, and unless the government gives them a significantly different steer on commercial development then the LDF will be signed and sealed by March 2012.
There is not a lack of land, Wakefield has more land than ever in modern history, just the plans for a very small part of it that is changing!
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: bigalf "Be careful, you may find that as time goes by and if the latest LDF goes through, Yorkcourt need WTWC less and less. Stranger things have happened in business.
Think how many flat pack wharehouses they could build on 51 hectares for 15 to 20 million pounds .......
This is true but I don't think Yorkcourt will walk away from their current commitment on this site (which I expect is also covered by some legal looking bits of paper, if you know what I mean). Also, the planning committee is still made up of politicians and I bet planning permission would be harder to get if they tried!!! The bigger worry for me would be Yorkcourt walking away (which I still doubt) from the site full-stop and then leaving the site open for another developer to come in and just develop the site for B8.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: TRB "Back to NM - can I publicly state what a great job IA did at the presentation on Tuesday.
It is minor to the work you have done and continue to do, but thank you, it means a lot to hear that from you.
As for our cyclist friend then all he needed was the 'correct' information to change his mind, which he did when he realised what the development was giving him and others in positives and very few negatives.
The guy from Methley Bridge was also much clearer on things and I think his overall opinion did change. We were talking about some exiting issues with Lafarge flouting (he says) an existing planning condition preventing them from using Watergate/Newmarket Lane and how a weight and physical width restriction might solve that problem and guarantee his only other worry, the accidental use of Watergate by HGV's to access the site. I fully support him on this and told him I would happily help longer term if Leeds or Wakefield did not make that a reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|