dont agree , hes lazy and overated, only had a go against hull as hes after a contract trying to impress agar

and against a very disappointing hull side next week will be normal service again

Big call but I could imagine if he was 100% fit and focussed he'd not be far off the Andy Farrell mould.

And about the 40 tackles a game.

Waste of time that old boy, we all know its empty think its called a vacuum

Tell you what though, you give your head a good shake whenever it suits you, and remember it you ever hear a rattle inside go to the neurological dept at the hospital, they will sort you out, then they can call it another miracle of modern science

Saw Cookey yesterday afternoon on Prinny Ave in Hull with his lass ,looks a lot slimmer close up ! Top bloke watch him turn it on in the next few weeks .

I disagree with people saying Cooke would be better at 13. For me he is an old fashioned 6 who if he plays should stay there to be honest. His athletisism is not what a 13 should be and neither is his work rate. To put him at 13 would deprive the team of a workhorse whose workload Cooke would not take up. When Oneill came over and we fitted him in at 13 it looked like we had too many chiefs and not enough indians on the field and we struggled and people were bemoaning the lack of a proper 13 then. I think in more recent times people said similar stuff when Latu played at loose. For me this season JD, Morro, Fergy and Johnson are all better options for wakey at loose forward. Cooke is a half back and that is it imo.

100% disagree. Cooke is the exact opposite of Andy. Cooke has never shown any signs during his career of being a grafter. Andy was a grafter with good skills as well. Cooke never will be anything like what Farrell was imo.

top bloke dont make me laugh

which lass this time got form you know

Brilliant, No really

Listened on Yorkshire Radio today, appears they think he and JD where the target of the fans vitriol?

lol short memories, Farrell was regarded as nothing but a Fielden from many quarters.