|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 112 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2010 | Jun 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Our Local Paper does not support Wakefield Trinity in barely any way at all, they do only put things in that would deem to sell, if you as a supporter see something on front re stadium you would buy it though, wouldn't you? Question is...how much do the club pay for advertising in the rag? I cannot recall any adverts for games etc. therefore as WTWRLFC are not customers of the paper they can not hold them over a barrel and question their intentions
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 1019 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jun 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Khlav Kalash="Khlav Kalash"We all know that, before they had even seen any plans it was all ‘stadium no thanks’ which kind of shows them up for what they are. The 'not against the stadium' front is purely designed as a tactic so not to vex 4/5K Trinity supporters, although browsing though the objections yesterday there was one from a 'long life' (doesn’t sound like a sports fan IMO) supporter of Wakefield Trinity who opposed the development.'"
Not me  |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 14129 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote lifelongfan="lifelongfan"Not me
'"
Indeed, most would write that term the way you have it. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 7494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2003 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Sep 2016 | Apr 2016 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote t-r-i-n-i-t-y="t-r-i-n-i-t-y"The Press Complaints Commission is a complete waste of time. How many lies do you see on the front of the tabloids corrected on page 33?
Don't like what they print? Don't buy it!'"
Agreed. Just don't buy the useless rag. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 12549 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
|
I dont buy it. Useless rag.
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 10926 | London Skolars |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just to let you know that we will doing precisely nothing about the WE feature.
We would reckon that all the issues raised are well known to the developer and that most, if not all, will have been dealt with already. As such, a response would just fuel the flames and give the WE the reaction they are seeking.
So - for once - no letters required!  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 7431 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Knowing the apathy of a lot of Wakey supporters TRB i'm sure you'll get your wish!!  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 10926 | London Skolars |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote JINJER="JINJER"Knowing the apathy of a lot of Wakey supporters TRB i'm sure you'll get your wish!!
'"
For once - yes!  |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 17 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... efault.htm
I see no reason why this will be automatically called into the regional planning office after doing a bit of homework on the UDP and the new framework thats replacing it.
Basically, the document which classifies part of the site (in name only) is called the Unitary Development Plan (UDP), the "all encompassing" document spelled out which land you could and couldn't develop, however this document is due to be fully replaced by the Local Development Framework (LDF), which is organised in a very different manner.
Rather than having one grand scheme the local planning office reviews each case independently, with a view to how it will improve the region and what benefits it will bring. - Meaning J30 can be viewed as case on it's own by planners, aside from former classification. On this basis i think objectors would have a very serious case finding fault, when you consider the amount of documentation and depth of study that has been put in by Yorkcourt and their team.
Interestingly parts of the UDP have ALREADY been removed and replaced- For me that already seriously undermines the key point of the WCCG's cause.
This method seems very progressive and forward thinking, which is strange when you consider it was produced by Boxy and his mates!!
|
|
www.wakefield.gov.uk/Planning/Sp ... efault.htm
I see no reason why this will be automatically called into the regional planning office after doing a bit of homework on the UDP and the new framework thats replacing it.
Basically, the document which classifies part of the site (in name only) is called the Unitary Development Plan (UDP), the "all encompassing" document spelled out which land you could and couldn't develop, however this document is due to be fully replaced by the Local Development Framework (LDF), which is organised in a very different manner.
Rather than having one grand scheme the local planning office reviews each case independently, with a view to how it will improve the region and what benefits it will bring. - Meaning J30 can be viewed as case on it's own by planners, aside from former classification. On this basis i think objectors would have a very serious case finding fault, when you consider the amount of documentation and depth of study that has been put in by Yorkcourt and their team.
Interestingly parts of the UDP have ALREADY been removed and replaced- For me that already seriously undermines the key point of the WCCG's cause.
This method seems very progressive and forward thinking, which is strange when you consider it was produced by Boxy and his mates!!
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
