i was under the impression that Newton's wage was used to pay for Cooke's and probably most of Gledhill's wage and Hudds were paying the majority of Kirmond's? We can't of got that much money off Hudds then if we don't have any money free! Or am i wrong?

think we probably have to face facts that the crowds have come in to our income projections again!

It's not just crowds - sponsorship is very hard to come by and the actual cash even harder!

ah!

so therefore what we have is what we have got for this season?

mmm we sure dont need a lot of injuries then!

Backs to the wall - love it!

Think it's the same at every club this season.The injury list @ Leeds proves that point. The financial position out there is probably more severe than last year for many companies. So there's no miracle cure on the horizon.Anyone who can field a relatively experienced 17 every week will stand a chance.
We will have the odd hic-ups here and there but we do posess a group of players that cover most bases and our kids have also tasted a fair amount of game time to have confidence in them.

if true its bloody bad business we have lost Newton and Brough who must have being on big money i like the Gledhill signing but we now need a top class scrum half and a decent hooker
Cooke and Kirmond are poor signings when you look at who we have lost

We have lost our 2 best play makers and replaced them with players who will not dictate or turn a game

I get what you're saying, but it's never that straight forward - is it.

If Brough was on that much money, he surely would have stayed.

Was told at begining of the week he's heading back to Leeds................................by a loiner, we shall see!!!!

Fail to see how Newton can be classed as one of our two best playmakers!