Might be proportionate to there salaries... £300 in Moore's case might be 5% of his weekly income whereas LMS' £200 fine might make up 80% of his salary therefore punishing LMS more if you the jist

Wakefield never seem to appeal any ruling from the disciplinary, WHY ???.

With these decision's the panel have set themselves a benchmark that punching and head butting gets at least a one match ban.So lets see if they carry it on through the season.

The fine is to offset the cost of travel from London to Leeds.

No worries bud.

Totally agree with that what a joke

Interesting that in the RFL report it mentions that it was Oli Wilkes that started it all by punching Mr Moore in the scrum (unusual name for a body part I know

), so obviously no love lost their

Totally bizarre.
Lms gets less of a punishment for a head butt, surely far worse than a punch or so the grading suggests!
At the same meeting Kirkpatrick gets a fine but no ban for "striking", surely this means punch and coyle gets one match and no fine for a high tackle.
In summary Moore and Qakefield come off worst for what was probably the least offence.
My concern with appealing would be that they would increase his punishment as their thought processes appear non existent.

if i have told you once i have told you a million times all posters are allowed an exaggeration allowance

Maybe they thought that Moore was the instigator?

Read the report!! It states that Moore was retaliating to a punch from Wilkes in the scrum











Well that's Richard's story anyway................and he's sticking to it

chill out all last time we came home from qimms we ended up loosing 2 players one of whom ran off to daddy

i aint gonna argue with richie