Pretty much my view, Leaguefan. How can they call themselves London Skolars if half of them are actually just on loan from another club? Mind you, it could keep the wage bill down I suppose. Just rent players, instead of buying them...

If Keighley were getting beaten 80-0 at home every week, I suspect that the few fans that remained would be glad to see them. I certainly would.



Skolars aren't a feeder team.

The British government made it harder for overseas players to get visas, Brendon was a victim of this. Skolars have been hit hard because they were fairly reliant on quota players. At first they put out their local lads but they were getting slaughtered so they had to go begging Quins for some players.

I have to say someone mentioned to me at the game on sunday we should be a feeder club for Halifax, it is irrelevant who you are feeding your identity disappears overnight I support and watch Keighley Cougars not Bulls or anyone else.

I have noticed that more and more super league clubs are making partnerships with championship clubs. The Rhinos are a prime example take York for example who have access to Leeds fringe players to give them game time etc, the same is being done with Whitehaven.

To me this is a sly way of these clubs starting the slippery slope of being a feeder club in all but name.

I would give up watching cougars if there was any move towards this. We are doing ok at the moment. We are Keighley Cougars its that simple.

Just touching on the Skolars situation, if they have access to Harlequins players yet they are not on loan or contracted to them how can this be anything but being a feeder club.

Because they are still a club in their own right. They can make decisions that will effect their own future and that includes borrowing players when the alternative is to get smashed.

But surely if they borrow players from another club, they lose the moral (for want of a better phrase) right to call themselves by their original name?
I mean, a Skolars side that fields Quins players as well is surely an amalgam of BOTH those clubs? Not just the one it's calling itself?

I don't think it is much different from signing players from another team. Most Keighley players won't have started their careers at Keighley and they probably won't be finishing it here either. Really all players are effectively "on loan" to a club.

I think we'll have to agree to differ on that one - unless half of the rhinos side are available to become Keighley players for a while on 30th July! Just until we've beaten Dewsbury, then they can magically become rhinos again...

Imagine Rob Burrow in a Keighley shirt.

No, it still aint right. I couldn't take any pride in a victory that relied on a wedge of borrowed players. I mean, it just wouldn't be Keighley Cougars, would it?

Wally Lewis guested for Wakefield and Andrew Johns for Warrington.

Two former Cougar Cubs are now playing in the Bulls Academy, what if they were to be loaned to Keighley?, and another two are in the Leeds Academy, what if any of these 'home grown players' were to grace Cougar Park on a loan spell?
I'd pay to see that.