Yes I agree, no suprise, it appears there are two sets of rules in superdooper league too, one rule for the big 4 and and another for the rest, i.e. Crusaders...


Pooo (can we have a pooo smiley, please)

No, there's just one set of rules - that is constantly changing!

Seriously, did you expect anything else than them supporting their chums in this way?

Pathetic, yes. Unexpected, no.

Rule 1.

The SL is always right.

Rule 2.

When the SL is wrong, see Rule 1.

Yet again the RFL and Super League put money before the integrity of the game.

Maybe the supporters groups of all the teams in the championships should get together, pool their resources and fund a marketing campaign to get fans to boycott next years World Cup and any company who is involved with sponsoring it. It seems they only care about money so why don't we hit them in the only place where it will hurt?

The latest would suggest the Dulls future in SL is far from certain. I understand that in view of the change in ownership the RFL will be completing a mini license review. I think Featherstone should be given their chance in SL. They have earned it. It will just depend on the off the field stuff. Will be the RFL have the balls to put the Dulls in the Championship. I don't think so.

Bradford were never going to get kicked out.

No matter what anyone thinks there are one of the big clubs in SL. They will look after there own.
Any club could be in the same boots as the Bulls are.

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/19600011 FFS Well thats it,no fooooker is gonna get in to SL,sod the lot of em

www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/19600011 FFS Well thats it,no fooooker is gonna get in to SL,sod the lot of em

It was always on the cards so I can't say I'm surprised. This one year probation is interesting, but I suppose it will keep teams interested only for the door to be shut in their face again in 12 months. A break away has to be the way forward. I'm sure the Championship could run on it's own.