Has anyone seen this orginal post on the Bulls forum?:
QuoteBradford Bulls will announce administration at 10am on Friday or 10am Wed after the public holiday.
Sad news. but one we all knew would happen under Caisley. He will then buy the new company after all our talent has been sold to the highest bidder.
Its up too lads like Bateman & Whitehead to refuse to be sold to clubs if they want to stay with Bradford after they come out the otherside.
If all the young lads get together and say there not leaving n form a pact... But were asking alot.'"
Oh dear! What will the RFL do now?
No precedents?
Obviously none of their previous mismangement will come into play when Caisley, Coulby and Northern are concerned! It will certainly be interesting to see what happens and their justification for the decisions that they take!
QuoteStealth Comic="Stealth Comic"Even the title of the thread says it is unconfirmed.'"
We live in hope that it is true
Caisley rearing his big stupid ugly head again has just made me despise that club even more .... I wish the worst for Caisley (The Horrible little man)
Probably not PC within rugby circles ... but who cares.
Caisley didnt give a **** about us when superleague was launched.
So long as Bulls are kicked out of Super League for next season if they go into administration (on the basis that their business plan submitted to the RFL when 'applying' for a "Super League Licence" must to say the least, have been "misleading), I don't mind - leave him to it.
This season's Championship Grand Final Winners (whoeever it might be) to take Bulls' place in Super League next season.
It was my understanding that when London went into admin, reformed the next day and carried on in SL regardless there was no RFL rule to cover it. The rules were then changed so that, if a club went into admin, they lost their SL license. Am I correct? If so can anyone find it in the rules before the RFL quietly change it?
QuoteFax Machine="Fax Machine"It was my understanding that when London went into admin, reformed the next day and carried on in SL regardless there was no RFL rule to cover it. The rules were then changed so that, if a club went into admin, they lost their SL license. Am I correct? If so can anyone find it in the rules before the RFL quietly change it?'"
Scratch that comment! I'd forgotten that the rule was revoked again.......the week before Crusaders went bust..........the first time, that is.
Well the RFL better kick them out of super league if they go under - Funny they stopped Keighley going up many years ago, and then let Northern strip all the promotional ideas you had.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Caisley rearing his big stupid ugly head again has just made me despise that club even more .... I wish the worst for Caisley (The Horrible little man) 
ALL THE VERY BEST CHRIS IN YOUR BID FOR SURVIVAL 
