To be fair I would say at least 2 of them were not his fault but the others definately were, on 1 of them Devin Hester tried to use the umpire as a shield and proceded to run into the back of him hence creating an interception

. and another one was definate pass interference by the CB/Safety on Greg Olsen as he was going to catch the ball, I think it may have been Mark Roman who basically just knocked him out of the way about 20 yards past the line of scrimmage

.

The others however were just terrible forced passes and he just threw the ball in the air on other occasions instead of throwing out of bounds so he could have had more!

To be honest it wasnt a very good game but Chicago still had a chance to win until he was intercepted in the end-zone with about 1 second to go.

I like Singeltarys coaching style he just shouts at people for doing something wrong and they never learn, he will go far

WOW Cutler was bad.

Maybe i was COMPLETELY WRONG about Josh McDaniels?



He's got his team to play far better than i expected with a very good D and has somehow managed to trade for a better QB and draft picks.



Rodgers > Orton > Cutler

Everybody has bad games mate. It could be worse, he could have thrown 3 picks against one of the leagues worst pass defences and get beaten by a rookie quarteback.

San Fran's D isn't much better than Tampa statistically. (Passing Tampa are dead last but San Fran are 20th)

Jay has thrown more interceptions (17) than TD's (14) and has thrown for more INT's than Manning, Brady, Roethlisberger, Rodgers, Rivers, Romo, Warner, Favre have thrown TD's. Actually he has thrown more INT's than TD's compared every QB other than Schaub and Brees who are tied with him with 17.

Also Cutler has been getting significantly worse QB ratings while increasing INT's each year.


As i said, with a better line and a better RB Cutler is worse. Rodgers >>> Cutler.

Freeman> Rodgers. Tampas D is just 12 places better then.



Throwing 3 picks against the leagues worst pass D is bad

I find it amusing that you use his INT stat as a way to put him down when your love interest Favre has career numbers in this category. Favre has had seasons when he has thrown alot of picks.

[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/extramustard/hotclicks/11/12/the-who-to-perform-at-halftime-of-super-bowl-xliv/index.htmlLinky - try to ignore the pic

[/url

Can't see it before on here, but suggestions of The Who at the Super Bowl half time show...boy I'd love that

Me too

Yes 12 places, the difference is only just over a yard.

3 picks is indeed bad, with the worst offensive line in the NFL he still only has 5 picks on the season and is in the top 5 (performance wise) QB's.

Favre has put in alot of INT's. I've never denied that, oh and he isn't my love interest. In his last season with us [uHE[/u cost us the place in the SB with a stupid pass that was picked off by NYG.

By the same token he has thrown a number of ridiculously good passes that should be picked off and aren't and he won us games single handedly so i can forgive him for the INT's.

Cutler hasn't yet shown he is as good. Last year for example they needed one win from three to make the play-offs and they blew it. His passer rating has gone down each year. (88.5, 88.1, 86.0, 76.0) while his interceptions have increased each year (5, 14, 18, 17) I think it is safe to assume he'll throw one or two more picks before the season ends.

Two red zone INT's in the San Fran game, even if they only got FG they would have won 12-10. I have seen the Bears twice this year and each time Cutler has cost them the game and thrown 4 or 5 picks (can't remember if it was 4 or 5 versus us). The San Fran game and the first game of the year against us.

Out of interest why wasn't Rodgers, if he is elite as you say, expected to take GB back to the playoffs last year? He inherited a 13-3 team. Mr Brady, of whom you say Rodgers is of similar stature, inherited a team that had gone 5-11 the season before to the Superbowl after leading them to an 11-5 record (I believe they were 11-3 with him as starter that year).

He isn't an elite QB yet, the TB game showed this in fact his 10-14 record as a starter shows this. There are 31 other teams in this league please, please, please start to recognise that there is more talent out there than just at Green Bay.

Cos he cant finish a game

You can't expect a first year starting QB with the youngest team around him to make the play-offs straight away. Can it happen, yes it can but it certainly isn't expected and the Packers organisation and myself as a fan didn't expect it. I would have been happy with a decent record and a shot at the play-offs.

Secondly the team around him were not the same level as the year before. Ryan Grant being the prime example, he was excellent in Favre's last season but held-out and was injured.

As it goes Rodgers was our best player last season by a clear distance.



Rodgers isn't a similar stature. I've said he [ucould[/u be consistently as good. He is performing excellently this year and did last year with a terrible O line. This year he is performing as well as virtually every QB in the league not called Brees/Manning.



Did you see the game or are you just basing it on stats?


Again, it was an all around poor team performance. Rodgers didn't do anything particularly wrong, our pourous O-Line means he has to run around too much.



I do recognise that. We aren't the best team and we don't have the best player in any position. Brees is the best QB, Peterson and Jackson are the best RB's etc.

We have an average RB, a horrible O-Line, average pass rush and an abysmal special teams.

What annoys me is people don't recognise how good our good players are because we are small market team.

[uWhat does Rodgers have to do to be elite?[/u He is performing as well as ANY QB (Not Manning/Brees) in the league, without a doubt in the top 5 with a terrible O-Line that can't protect him and an average running game to support him. I'd bet if he played for a "bigger" team, say Dallas and was doing exactly the same production he'd be regarded much more by the media and people on here. The same goes for Greg Jennings and Aaron Kampman for us and Matt Schaub at Houston.

Where would you place Rodgers in the best QB's?

To answer your first opinion, i was merely stating that you had compared Rodgers to the abilities of Brady. Brady is a 1st ballot HOF who has been clutch all his career, Rodgers so far hasn't.

On the 2nd point i'll give you that having looked, you stated he could be as good as Brady, i personally don't think he will be. As i stated before Brady has been a clutch QB all his career. There is no QB i have seen who i would rather have out there down by 6 with 2:00 to go. This is why i think you guys are an average team, Brady finds ways to win for his team while Rodgers doesn't quite manage it yet.

Point 3. I didn't see the game, as you know i follow the Rams for my sins. I don't base my opinions completely on stats. I base my opinion on players performing consistently when the chips are down, something i haven't really seen Rodgers do. I will readily admit i haven't followed his career as closely as yourself so stand to be corrected if he has lead GB on a few game winners. How many changes were made to the team between 07 and 08 out of interest?

I think people do recognise that you have good players. Green bay gets more coverage than a lot of teams due to their individuality. You don't really help yourself with some of your statements though. I think you stated earlier in the thread that GB has a better receiving corps than NE? Welker and Moss are head and shoulders above anyone in the league IMO.

I don't consider Rodgers elite as he hasn't got the record to be an elite QB. To be elite for me you have to have done it consistently and led teams to the playoffs.

I would personally take P and E Manning, P Rivers, D Brees, B Roethlisberger and T Brady over him. All have performed consistently and have led their teams to the playoffs. These are all my personal opinions of course and i look forward to reading your reply