Anyone who plays for my team was brilliant for England...anyone who plays for our rivals..were rubbish!!!!

Shorey looked a lot more assured and confident when he played for England.

As for Shorey's crossing, you have to admit that it was poor last night

The only difference Carrick made was that he sat back on a few occasions so Barry pressed forward.

Crouch and SWP had a far more positive effect on the performance and the scoreline.

I am always suspicious by United fans when they cry about others being anti-United. I always feel it's because they need their ego massaging. It's as if you want me to gush about United.

You have to accept that not everyone loves the team you attached yourself to. It's something you are going to have to get used to. Every fan is biased but I have no qualms about lavishing praise on here for any players regardless of teh team they score. That includes the praise I have given to Ferdinand and Rooney. Because I don't rate scouse Mikey, Carrick and Anderson, doesn't mean I am biased. You need to stop playing the victim

Conversely, some people are unhappy because players from the team they support, were poor last night.

I don't want or expect people to praise Utd players whatsoever but lets face it the majority of your posts are always anti Utd or Spurs. Anyway I don't want to get into a penis measuring competition about it. Carrick has been at the heart of the side that has won the PL for the last three years and he is a very good player to have as backup to Gerrard, Lampard, Barry who seem to have their spots firmly cemented under Capello.

Insomnia and the internet is a wonderful thing sometimes, I managed to watch the France/Spain and Germany/Argentina games in full after England/Egypt.

There's nothing much more to say about Spain, they were on a different level to France and they weren't even at their most fluid best - the depth of their squad is frightening too, they took off Fabregas and Villa at half time and only had Xavi and Torres to replace them. Definitely the favourites, but everyone can have an off day and that's all it takes in the KO stage and you are gone, the defence still has question marks over it, but the problem is getting enough of the ball to test them.

France are way off the pace for me, Domenech couldn't seem do anything with them when they still had a smattering of world class players, now they have all but gone (or got old) there seems little chance of even a couple of players dragging them through to a decent finish like Zidane and Henry did in 2006.

The biggest surprise about Germany/Argentina is that, under Maradona, Argentina actually looked like a competent team for a change. Having seen a few of their qualifiers they played like a bunch of individuals with no idea what they were supposed to be doing as a whole, if last night wasn't a one off and they continue to build into a better unit for the tournament then they have every chance of doing well.

On the other hand Germany were disappointing, they didn't look like a team at all. I'm not sure if they were experimenting but there were a few players I wasn't familiar with and they didn't impress. Then again we all know that they are always a different proposition when it comes to the actual tournament.

Trying to be as unbiased as possible, I would say Carrick always looks a yard off the pace in mind and body against the big teams. When he has plenty of time to pick a pass there's not many better but when a snap decision/play needs making, he seems to get the ball taken off him or plays a stray pass. Premiership class but not international class for mine. If Hargreaves were fit, I wouldn't be taking Carrick to the World Cup.

He's not at the heart of the United team. Vidic? Yes. Fletcher? Yes. Rooney? Yes. Van De Saar? Yes. Ferdinand? Yes. Ronaldo? Yes. Carrick - squad player.

Carrick simply isn't good enough for England and this is reflected in the selections by the likes of Sven and Capello.

Domenech attempting to explain France's lethargic football by laying the blame for Thierry Henry's sub-standard performance at the feet of Barcelona

Carrick's more than a squad player. He's one of the first names on the team sheet. When he plays just behind Fletch and Scholes/Anderson he's class. He can also play well in a middle two, although at times this season when with just Scholes our midfield hasn't got into the game.

Hargreaves - Carrick - Fletcher/Anderson is a midfield that I look forward to seeing play.

A Lampard - Carrick - Barry midfield would work pretty well too IMO, but that obviously isn't going to happen.

www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 15658.html Andy Cole on why he didnt get on with Sheringham. The bizarre thing is why nobody seems to have bothered sitting them down to sort it out.

www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 15658.html Andy Cole on why he didnt get on with Sheringham. The bizarre thing is why nobody seems to have bothered sitting them down to sort it out.

My take on it. Andy Cole is clearly mental. His mentalism isn't affecting the team in any way, so you let it be.

I can understand Cole being miffed over his perceived snub, but he has to have some empathy with Sheringham as well in that situation. Sheringham's got similar feelings to Cole as to how much playing for England means, his substitution is likely to have been as unwelcome to Sheringham as it was welcome to Cole. I don't think Sheringham would've been snubbing Cole, he'd have just been massively upset over possibly losing his England place.

Put yourself in Sheringham's position when they were both at Man United. There's a sad fool who won't talk to you just because you don't shake his hand when he was replacing you. Would you want to be talking to that idiot? I wouldn't.

I think everyone knew that Cole and Sheringham didn't get on. I think most people will be shocked about just what a petty argument it was over. Andy Cole's a big girl IMO.